10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPSE hack. need help pls
Leading reported evidence
Install so i was thinking
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I didnt notice any improvements on the muffler when it was installed so I was thinking to add the MK 1 which I found out was the correct hack for the 3.4 cans.
Leading evidence: 'Install so i was thinking' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install so i was thinking' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Install so i was thinking
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I didnt notice any improvements on the muffler when it was installed so I was thinking to add the MK 1 which I found out was the correct hack for the 3.4 cans.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Okay, I got a c2 3.4 I asked a local welder to make me a PSE hack. Showed him the pics and he did a good job. Problem is, its the wrong hack
Didnt notice that it was for a MK II !
wish I can buy a used set of mufflers but im in the Philippines and nobody sells used or new. Do you guys think I can just have them cover up the part that was cut and make a new MK I hack or leave the MKII and add MKI. what would work best? Thanks in advance.
it works...post a pic of your current hack..adding the second pipe will be fine, you can undersize it a little - BTW the 3.4 cans are harder to put the big pipe in if they have that huge seem. I used 3.6 cans
thanks for the info Ivangene. Ill get some pics once I get it hacked tomorrow
Smaller pipe for the MK1 hack? I got a 2" pipe on the MKII. should I use something smaller on the MK1?
everything you need to know"
https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...-real-pse.html
my poost is about 520? I posted pics... but you will find two types of cans, seemed and capped... the seemed ones seem to get the smaller "J" pipe and the capped oned the larger elbow.. I never saw a reason not to have the elbow on the seemed ones... or put both pipes on one can (there are pics in this monster thread of both.. but you have toi dig thru it)
E
Im going to need some help guys. My muffler is a 3.4 can with PSE hack MK2. I didnt notice any improvements on the muffler when it was installed so I was thinking to add the MK 1 which I found out was the correct hack for the 3.4 cans. should I do this:
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...k-designs.html
OR this one which has the mod j pipe on the side of the inlet and outlet:
http://www.oz951.com/public/emmypics...fister_mod.jpg
The J pipe (inlet pipe to outlet pipe, like shown in the second URL above) is the only one that Darin Fister does on 3.4 and 3.6 cans now. I had Darin do the mod on my 3.4 cans and they sound incredible! I hear the improvement a little bit with the hardtop on and the windows closed. But with the windows down or with the ragtop, you can really hear it. I just love it!
no pics of what you did?
OK.. before saying there is no differance....have you driven in a covered parking garage or tunnel.... the PSE hack makes a pretty subtle internal cabin noise change and a significant external one...(hense why people like it, the dont go deaf from droning)
so without reading all those MKI and II differances again (since I dont have a 996 anymore and really have forgotten since its been so long ago) draw on a picture using "Paint" and show me what you have...I think the second pic is what you want (J-Pipe) for the 3.4 cans
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
