14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH142k mile C4S hitting $75k on BAT!!!
Leading reported evidence
Replace but upgraded
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Even with the high mileage, seems most all wear point systems have not only been replaced but upgraded.
Leading evidence: 'Replace but upgraded' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace but upgraded' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The engine was replaced with a Flat 6 Innovations 4.0-liter flat-six via LN Engineering at a cost of over $31k in 2025
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T061123Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This seems crazy. The car is very well kept and has an FSI 4.0 but 75k + fees and shipping seems like a lot for a car with high miles.
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/20...a-4s-coupe-73/
Does the FSI engine add that much value?
You have essentially a new engine:
The engine was replaced with a Flat 6 Innovations 4.0-liter flat-six via LN Engineering at a cost of over $31k in 2025
Add the extensive list of solid upgrades to the car, along with a desirable color, this price isn't all that surprising
Not crazy at all. C4S tend to carry a premium because people like the wider body. Yellow will carry a premium. Complete engine rebuild which makes mileage from engine perspective irrelevant = premium. Lot's of other maintenance records = premium. Great presentation and photos = believe it or not, premium. Nicely spec'd interior with Sport seats = premium. It's a really nicely executed car without any questionable mods so I hope it gets all the money!
Porsche 911s have a unique mileage to market value ratio. In that regard, they are a bit of an outlier in the general car world. I would compare them to the Toyota Land Cruiser as far as retaining value even with high mileage. But they are especially unique in the exotic/sports car world. While most exotics depreciate in value rapidly with miles, there are lots of examples of 911s, especially air-cooled, with well over 100k miles, even over 200k miles, selling for relatively large figures. The one thing that those 911s tend to have in common is a rebuilt engine, but they also typically have original paint and a rare color combo really helps.
It's definitely true in the air cooled world - I have just haven't seen it apply as often in the water cooled cars.The engine rebuild that addresses all of the core M96 faults certainly doesn't hurt.
Replacement FSI 4.0-Liter Flat-Six
Six-Speed Manual Transaxle
All-Wheel Drive
Speed Yellow Paintwork
Black Leather Upholstery
Refinished 18″ Turbo-Look Wheels
�hlins Road & Track Coilovers
H&R Sway Bars
Girodisc Rotors
GT3 Control Arms
Auto-Blip System & Numeric Racing Cables
SOUL Headers
Not surprising to me. not with that long list of some of the best 996 options available. And many great other options aren't listed above but are listed in the BaT ad $$$$
Even with the high mileage, seems most all wear point systems have not only been replaced but upgraded. Some with the most expensive options a 996 can get. Like a $40K FSI 4.0. engine upgrade. Then the great condition sport seats are worth $5K many times on BaT alone, Girodiscs and Ohlins coil overs aren't cheap.
As long as there is not a problem with major systems on this car, its probably a less expensive option than getting a 30K C4S and putting in a FSI 4.0, then add in another 20-30k for all the other high end options...
Yes it is unusual to see this high a cost for a 996 C4S, but seems this one can back it up easily. On paper and pics, this car seems like one of the nicest m96 966 for sale in a long while, regardless of the high miles... And the owner is not ready to give it away...
Probably belongs to a forum member.
I am a bit skeptical of why an owner that obviously loved this car enough to spend tons more on this car than it ever could sell for. Wonder how it ends up now on a dealers lot...? Who upgrade$ this dra$tically and then sells a car like this ? Is this an estate car sale..?
I'd have a invasive PPI done for sure if interested in this car, just to make sure it is exactly what its listed as....
jmho
I watched this one. Stuck at $75k for a day or so then sold for $76k. I'm actually surprised it didn't get more of a push at the end. Nice car though - basically the Rennlist spec!
Excellent!
There should be a premium for every 996 with an interior and exterior in great shape that has been properly sorted with parts that have been refreshed and/or upgraded and a professionally rebuilt engine.
For those enthusiasts that want to keep their 996. We all know that it will cost you
~$10k to refresh/maintain/upgrade engine parts for durability,
~8-10k for a suspension refresh,
~$8-10k for an exhaust refresh, and
~$8-10 for exterior and interior refresh/upgrades to make it look pretty.
Add in a professional rebuild and you are looking at an additional ~$30-40k.
If i was to take a WAG, i would bet the previous owner bought the car in 2016 for around $20k and put in an additional $50-60k in the car.
The new owner got into a well sorted car for substantially less than they would have to spend to do the same thing today.
we need to see more of this on BAT.
Thumbs up to the new owner. 👍
It's very cool to see this. Really helps swallow the potential investment if there seems to be some sort of potential value here versus just sinking the money in and seeing no real bump in value. The thing i'm most curious about is why did they sell it? Feels like if you go this far with it, that you would keep it forever.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.