14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFine Scratches in Paint! Need Advice
Reported or suspected cause
preparation while only 10% is due
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
But as I have learned, 90% of a car looking good is due to preparation while only 10% is due to the products that you use.
Leading evidence: 'preparation while only 10% is due' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'preparation while only 10% is due' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check with the forums at autopia.org' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
But as I have learned, 90% of a car looking good is due to preparation while only 10% is due to the products that you use.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would check with the forums at Autopia.org for which product you can and cannot use.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Or in the alternative you can use any polish and just use an alcohol wipe down to remove the oils, fillers, and waxes.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Or in the alternative you can use any polish and just use an alcohol wipe down to remove the oils, fillers, and waxes.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The hood on her car could use some polishing anyway, so that will be a good "training ground." Once I get done with "boot camp" I'll move on to the P-car.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T120458Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have some fine scratches (swirl marks) in the paint on my 996. After I have cleaned (clayed), polished, and sealed the paint the scratches are minimized. But after a few weeks the scratches are quite noticeable again. What product have you found that yields the best results to hide or minimize the scratches? Thanks for the advice!
3M Perfect It-II Swirl Mark Remover for DARK cars and if you can, apply it with a dual-action polisher instead of by hand. If the scratches are too deep for that then go with 3M Perfect It-II Rubbing compound (fine cut). In either case your scratches will be gone and not just hidden. The Rennlist of paintcare seems to be
Autopia
and is definitely worth a look!
I agree with Jason on the 3M SMR for dark, but I wouldn't directly jump to 3M Perfect It Rubbing Compound - to abrasive IMO to go from SMR to Perfect It. Try SMR - work it with a Dual Action like Jason said. If that doesn't work, try 3M Finesse it III; not as abrasive as Perfect It but more so than SMR.
I have been a member of Autopia since it first opened it's doors - lots of great knowledge there about how to remove swirls. Go check it out and happy detailing!
There are all kinds of solutions for this. It just depends on what you want. Hide vs. Remove is the question you will have to decide. Realize with a color like Lapis Blue you are going to notice these "imperfections" rather regularily, especially on a daily driven car.
Your wash and dry technique can go a long way to minimizing these type of swirls. As suggested above check out the Autopia forums. Do a search for "two bucket" method of washing. Just, realize that on Autopia there some who take detailing to the extreme so don't be put off by some of the extremely time consuming procedures some use. Read and then decide what parts of their techniques you can live with.
Product wise there are dozens of choices for what will work. What your final protectant is will help you decide what products to use. Final polymer type sealants like Zaino, Rejex and Klasse require no oils, fillers or waxes to bond correctly. This will limit you to pure polishes (no fillers, oils, waxes, etc.). For example Menzerna and Poor Boy both make some excellet pure polishes. Or in the alternative you can use any polish and just use an alcohol wipe down to remove the oils, fillers, and waxes.
Einszett makes some extremely user friendly polishes, however they contain some wax. None of this matters if you are using a final product like P21S which is a carnauba based wax. True "waxes" don't bond like the sealants. The Einszett products work extremely well with metallic flake paing like Lapis Blue as they really seem to bring out the "pop" of the metallic flakes.
Completely agree with everything that bet has to say. But if you have the time, why hide them when you can completely remove them? Swirls are most often caused by improper washing technique and in most cases the types of 'tools' that you are using. Not all 'towels' are created equally (IMO). It may take some time up front to remove the swirls but maintenance of your car's paint is easy afterwards.
I have to respectfully disagree with bet that the last stage product, i.e. sealant or wax, determines what type of 'polish' you will use. The products that you would use to remove swirls do not contain the amount of wax or fillers that will affect proper 'bonding' of the last stage product.. If you are using something to simply hide the swirls and fill them in, i.e. a glaze, that is a different story completely and will most likely affect how a product bonds because it is not the actual paint that the product is adhering to.
The reason you see swirls and scratches is because there has been damage to the clear coat of your car and the light is catching the damage, causing you to see the swirl or the scratch. A polish will dull the edge of the imperfection (or if you work long enough remove the imperfection completely) to the point that the light is not caught and you won't see the swirl. That's why swirls and scratches are more pronounced underneath direct light, i.e. sun, parking lamps, etc. and are minimized in low light conditions.
In the end there are a ton of products to use. But as I have learned, 90% of a car looking good is due to preparation while only 10% is due to the products that you use.
Just adding my $.02. The visibilty of swirls depends alot on what your final layer is i.e. wax or sealant. Wax will not last as long but will hide swirls in the beginning with the swirls becoming more pronounced as the wax wears off. Sealants tend to be a lot more revealing of swirl marks. Most swirls on my ocean blue paint were reduced to not visible by just completely working a good polish in with a dual rotary like the porter cable. You really need to work the polish in so that it is almost completely gone. Everything above is good advice, just don't get to crazy a good rule from autopia is the 5 foot rule, "if not visible from 5 feet away leave it alone".
As far as which polish to use is only depends on the type of wax/sealant is true and false. Only the real finiky sealnats can't adhere to a polish. Ziano is notorious for this as it does not bind very well except bare paint. I would check with the forums at Autopia.org for which product you can and cannot use. Many actually polish the car then do a quick spay and wipe with a 50:50 water and alcohol wipe to apply Ziano. Yes you can hide swrils with a glaze/ polish like Meguiars #7, Mother seal and glaze, and some waxes do it like Meg NXT. This however will appear again as your top layer of wax washes off. The best way is to polish them out with a cleaner/ polish like Meguiars Scratch X or #80, Mothers Power Polish. The 3M SMR is rather weak and fills them more than removes them. You can do this by hand, but you'll spend lots of time and get an Arnold work out. I would go out and buy a Porter Cable and get some good pads. There are plenty of good polishes out there that you won't find at Pepboys. My favorites are Menzerna and Einszett, but if your getting it at Pepboys I like the Mother Power polish.
Guys - Thanks to all of you for the great feedback and advice. I REALLY do appreciate your responses.
I have already decided to get a Porter Cable 7424 polisher. I will try it first on my daughter�s '98 Rodeo. The hood on her car could use some polishing anyway, so that will be a good "training ground." Once I get done with "boot camp" I'll move on to the P-car. I anticipate that I can report back on the results in a couple of weeks. Thanks again, Guys!
A strong bit of advice for the Porter Cable:
ALWAYS HOLD IT BY THE HANDLE.
ask me how I know this...
3M three step(Swirl remover,compound,hand glaze) did a great job on my previous black car.
The other bit of advice on the PC...don't turn it on until you have the pad against the surface....if not you will have polish on everything except the pad and the car. The same is true turning it off....turn it off with the pad still on the car.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.