12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCheck out this poor guy's ad on autotrader...
Reported or suspected cause
very
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'very' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'very' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T031046Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
"This car is excellent original shape. Unfaithful wife forces divorce."
That's too much..... should have spent more time in the bedroom vs. in the garage!
-Eli
Yah,
When I wend through my divorce 5 years ago, I had to give up my dream house....
I loved that house so much I offered to give it to her so my daughter could be raised in it..... no dice!
-Eli
That F-Up. I mean if you were offering to give the house to raise a child and she rather take the money is just wrong. To me I love my children so much I am willing to sacrafice all for them and it seem like your ex was not. I guess its priority. As far as the ad guy, if my wife was unfaithful and the devorice is forcing the trade, I would try to screw her over and sell it for $10 to my best friend.
Yes, I see your point.....
And yes my ex has proven to be VERY.... "did I say" very? uncooperative with regards to our daughter. I have tried everything, currently I'm in a legal battle to gain as much custody of her as I can. Funny thing is last year my daughter asked "Dad, why are you selling the Jaguar".... I believe in total honesty with her so I had to explain so I can have the opportunity to speak with the judge
so in return we can get to spend more time together.... "sad conversation; she really loved the Jag"....
-Eli
