fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Cold morning!

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHCold morning!

Leading reported evidence

Replace 7 or 8 times

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

The old engine had the RMS replaced 7 or 8 times, so he thought failure was imminent.

Original post Read captured discussion
Cold morning!
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace 7 or 8 times' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace 7 or 8 times' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 14 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace 7 or 8 times

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

The old engine had the RMS replaced 7 or 8 times, so he thought failure was imminent.

Original post Read captured discussion
Cold morning!
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T173940Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I was surprised the car decided the "+" was necessary...

POST 2Original post

Am i reading that odometer right. 132k miles???

POST 3Original post

Geez, I thought my 112,000 was high mileage. Thanks for the encouragement, I think I'll go for a drive this weekend.

POST 4Original post

Quotes source post: 4941283

Well that puts my 9 degree's to shame :-D.

POST 5Original post

Quotes source post: 4941283

Maybe it detected that the temp was on the "warm" side of zero degrees! Something like 0.1 degree.

POST 6Original post

Quotes source post: 4941418

Well that would make a big difference.... It was -17 degrees when I left the house this morning ..

POST 9Original post

Quotes source post: 4941418

Glass is half full. Very positive p-car.

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Yep, that's the mileage! The PO replaced the engine at about 106k - although it didn't actually fail. The old engine had the RMS replaced 7 or 8 times, so he thought failure was imminent. Otherwise, the car is in great shape and has many, many more miles in it.

POST 11Original post

Quotes source post: 4942256

Phil, by the time you are at 132K miles it will be 2059!!!

POST 12Original post

Quotes source post: 4942256

that certainly takes the wind out of the porsche sail

POST 13Original post

Quotes source post: 4946525

Yeah, I don't take that mileage as much of a reassurance. It was an $80k+ car--you can get a regular car to that kind of mileage with nothing more than oil changes and gas. It's unfortunate that his (and mine and everyone else's) car required two engines to make it as far as they did.

POST 14Original post

Quotes source post: 4946553

0* Fahrenheit?, that's some kind of cold.... Well, here's a 130k original motor. http://www.renntech.org/forums/index...howtopic=17278

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.