17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCar Insurance problem
Leading reported evidence
Use once every 5 years
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
NJ MVC defensive driving program will take off 2 points and can be used once every 5 years.
Leading evidence: 'Use once every 5 years' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use once every 5 years' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Off topic but here goes....my 20 year old daughter just got another speeding ticket (total of 8 points in 2 years) and I was just notified they aren't renewing her on my policy....need advice from anyone in NJ.....what do I do now.....what insurance companies are the cheapest with "high risk" drivers. I have 5 cars and my Home Owners policy that I can serve up to a new insurance company....or should I just get a seperate policy for her and keep my policy as is...thanks for any thoughts.
Sounds like not only does she need high risk insurance ($$$) but she also needs a p/t job to pay for it
Growing up, if I was 8 pts in 2 yrs I would loose my car! Man you are lenient. Sorry I coudn't help with suggestions about companies. Hopefully somebody willchime in to help out.
As a 20 year old I have to say I can't believe she has 8 points and you are now trying to find another insurance for her. High risk driver's usually end up having to either use one of those senate insurance type deals were you pay $10k/year in 2 week payments or a state insurance pool if your state has one and even the ultra expensive comapnies won't cover her. Stick with your current insurance company for your own stuff...if you ever need a claim or have some bad luck you will still have some leverage that way (plus companies don't like people who move around, so if you move around you will find it harder to keep moving). I would take away the keys until at least half of those points are gone (that apparently means no more car for 2 years in NJ since it's 3 points off for every violation free year in NJ...well up to 3 anyways whatever that means). I wouldn't even let her pay for her own.
Perhaps she could take a defensive driving course to have some of the points removed? Most states would suspend her license for this many points in that short amount of time. Time to concentrate on the problem, rather than the solution.
1st of all, in NJ, most ticket you can amendment to "unsafe operation" with no points. and you can do 2 times in 5 years.
did u try that yet?
i think u should tell her a thing or 2 about driving. i would let her pay her own policy.
one observision, the most dangerous drivers i see on the road is tennage girls.
Males have more accidents b/c there are more males under 25 driving. Not sure but I would guess that women have a greater ratio of accidents based on a ratio of number of females driving to number of accidents of that total. Either way, sub 25 yr olds are screwed in the insurance premium department. My insurance bill dropped by over half the day I turned 25. Man did I celebrate!!!
I paid more for my '90 Honda Civic Si in the early nineties when I was in my early 20s than I do now for my 997. My sister never paid a dime until she left my parents house.
At the rate shes going no insurance is going to bring your daughter back?She needs a break from driving.Before somebody gets hurt.(for life) PS.is she fine.
Check this out.. In Germany *points* and *insurance* are not in any way connected to each other. You get points for moving violations, and if you get 12 points, it's bye - bye license (or you can lose your license immediately any number of ways). But points do not effect what you pay for auto insurance. Claims made on your auto insurance, and the age of the driver(s), and number of years experience are the determining factor. The longer you drive without a claim, the lower your rate of insurance.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.