13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHShould I be worried about cats?
Leading reported evidence
Check into the warranty
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Check into the warranty on those, by law the emissions systems may have longer warranties than the rest of the car.
Leading evidence: 'Check into the warranty' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check into the warranty' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Possible reasons for running rich (without running rich enough to get a CEL): Running exclusively on regular gasoline, driving exclusively in stop and go city traffic, too many short trips so that the cats don't reach operating temperature, using ethanol enhanced gasolines routinely (although the octane rating of ethanol enhanced premiums is higher, the engine doesn't see it that way and many cars ECUs will respond to ethanol combustion as if it was pre-detonation).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
This 996 tends to burn some oil in track use (you can see it in the exhaust), but nowhere near the level my Miata did in normal driving.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Possible reasons for running rich (without running rich enough to get a CEL): Running exclusively on regular gasoline, driving exclusively in stop and go city traffic, too many short trips so that the cats don't reach operating temperature, using ethanol enhanced gasolines routinely (although the octane rating of ethanol enhanced premiums is higher, the engine doesn't see it that way and many cars ECUs will respond to ethanol combustion as if it was pre-detonation).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey all -
I have an '01 C2, and the car is in the shop getting it's second new cat in less than a year (opposite side). It has about 50k on it, had maybe 46k when the other side was done last fall.
I asked my service advisor if this was common, and he said no. Should I be worried about any more significant upstream problems which may be causing this issue?
The car has no power mods, no changes to intake or exhaust. It's seen perhaps 15 track days since I got it two years ago.
TIA.
I've had a few bad cats in other cars, and it was oil-burning (Miata) or coolant in the exhuast (S4). This 996 tends to burn some oil in track use (you can see it in the exhaust), but nowhere near the level my Miata did in normal driving.
Check into the warranty on those, by law the emissions systems may have longer warranties than the rest of the car. I bet you can stick PCNA with the bill for those.
For example, my owner's manual says CA cars emission-related parts are warranteed for 7yr/70k miles.
The emissions warranty for my model year and region is 8/80, and the direct issue is being taken care of - the cat itself is not my concern. I'm worried there's some root cause for the cat issues that is more serious and more expensive. I'm wondering if there's a common 996 issue that might be driving it. If not, so be it, I won't get too worked up about it.
Gotcha.
I think it's rare for the cats to go bad so early, but I understand your concern since you've experienced it multiple times now. Not sure what the cause is, but I'd want to know also. Hope you figure it out.
The Cats can go bad if unburnt fuel makes it to the cat, where the heat ignites it within the cat. When this happens, you can blow out the ceramic internals of the cat, which makes it rattle unless you are on the gas. One potential cause can be fouled plugs. Have you tuned your car up lately?
TD
Thanks, good point. The car is running well and there's no other evidence of a rich condition, but I don't think the plugs have been touched. Appreciate the help.
they tend to fail on tracked cars, they are covered for 8years/80k miles but i wouldnt worry anymore, they arent covered once you say "I have tracked the car 15 times.................
Running rich over an extended period of time can cook your catalysts. Possible reasons for running rich (without running rich enough to get a CEL): Running exclusively on regular gasoline, driving exclusively in stop and go city traffic, too many short trips so that the cats don't reach operating temperature, using ethanol enhanced gasolines routinely (although the octane rating of ethanol enhanced premiums is higher, the engine doesn't see it that way and many cars ECUs will respond to ethanol combustion as if it was pre-detonation).
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
