30 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPhil, wake up!!!!!!!!
Leading reported evidence
Check profile
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check profile' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check profile' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It's sunny and mid 40's here today with clean roads, so it's a go!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
30 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Phil, wake up....... it's your Birthday!!!!
Happy Birthday, Phil! Give yourself a B-day present and drive the C4S today (weather permitting, of course).
Oh yeah, I almost forgot, I made you a cake! I ran out of room for the candles in top, so I had to put some on the SIDE of the cake!
Oh, by the way, in case you haven't noticed, the cake has more candles on it than your C4S has miles!
Yeah, the car's mileage and my age are altogether too close. I appreciate the Happy B'day from everyone! B-day is actually tomorrow, Tim - I know you couldn't wait, but I sure as hell can. And yes, I am absolutely taking the car out for a ride today and/or tomorrow. It's sunny and mid 40's here today with clean roads, so it's a go! Question is will the speedometer reach my age? No, it's not 30! Just double it.
I have more posts than Phil has miles on his car.
Get out there and drive it... you only get one ride on this spinning blue marble - make the best of it!
Tim got emotional just photoshopping the cake.
Thanks for the nice comments on the car and for everyone's well wishes for what promises to be a good day!!
If I calculate right, based on miles/yr driven......
those pics are almost 2 years old. According to R/L rule number 1, new pics are required when the old pictures no longer represent the car. In Phil's case (and for sure CASE is the word) even though 2 years have past, the car looks exactly the same as the pictures. (aside from the amber lights on the dash making a new number string ---- wohoo 3500 !)
So we are going to add rule #117:
We need new pictures every 2 years to see how big the trees in the background have become.
You will have new pics in the Spring when the trees (and the car) emerge from their winter sleep. And yeah, the car looks exactly like it did two years ago. I wish I could say the same for myself.
