26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTotal 911 - first issue now available!
Leading reported evidence
Use 'z' is correct uk spelling
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The use of 's' where you'd use a 'z' is correct UK spelling.
Leading evidence: 'Use 'z' is correct uk spelling' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 'z' is correct uk spelling' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The use of 's' where you'd use a 'z' is correct UK spelling.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The articles are excellent (I'll even overlook the use of an 's' when a 'z' is called for) and do seem to target us 911 people and not Porsche in general.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The articles are excellent (I'll even overlook the use of an 's' when a 'z' is called for) and do seem to target us 911 people and not Porsche in general.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The first issue of Total 911 magazine is now available in UK shops (including WHSmith and Tesco) and will be on sale in other countries very soon. You can also buy individual copies and subscriber onliine at
www.total911.com
.
Total 911 is different because it's not produced by a big, faceless publishing company, but by a small band of 911 enthusiasts who really believe in what they're doing.
So please support us and pick up a copy or, even better, subscribe.
Many thanks
Phil, Rob, John and Kevin
Our North American brethren will be able to find T911 in Borders and Barnes & Noble - there's a story from Canada (written by a fellow Rennlister - thanks Alon!) and a nice feature on Willow Springs. My guess is that it should appear on shelves in a week or so.
We hope you enjoy it and want to say thanks to all of those who helped.
BTW, there's a nice 996 on the cover if that helps!!
Can't wait to see a copy! From the looks of your "preview" page on the total911 site it looks very well put together. I'll be on the lookout at my local Borders.
Please don't say 8-12 weeks, I never understood why it would take so long to get a subscription going.
If we could pull orders out of here in days then why should it take weeks to get a single magazine out the door..... ????
Please say NEXT WEEK...... "make riad happy"!!!!!
-Eli
Kirby
send me an email to
[email removed]
Eli, Riad & Co
we saw a post on the 964 board - a subscriber in Chicago got his yesterday - so yours should be arriving anytime soon
Remember, if you like it tell a friend.
If you don't like it, quietly PM me so I can pay you to keep quiet!!! Just kidding!!
Oh, did I mention the 996 on the cover yet??
Was posted airmail on Monday, so I'd expect it to arrive within a few days of posting. Please let me know - it'll be useful to have a clear idea how long it takes. I know it has only taken a few days to Australia in the past...
Can I make a quick suggestion that soon after things take off, you should really investigate a US based subscription distribution model? With approximately US$50 just to cover airmail, that makes an annual subscription quite hefty.
My point exactly. I stated this in their initial thread a few weeks back about the debut of the magazine. With the exchange rate that is roughly $55 for shipping and $75 for the subcribtion puts the American subscriber at over $11 an issue.
Don't get me wrong, I think this will be a great mag but that is a large chunck of change to commit for a magazine on an intital launch. I will definitely pick one up at the local borders though when they arrive.
Hey Dell --
Sorry didn't read every post in detail -- sorry if I stated something you had already pointed out!
Has anyone found it at Borders in the US (specifically So Cal) yet?
Hey Led no biggie. I was just stating that I concur with you...not trying to point out that I already stated it. Sorry if it came out that way.........
I have been on the lookout at my local Borders with no luck yet
Guys
we hear ya! Its a PITA, but at the moment the options are limited. Slower mail (ie on a ship) is too slow for readers to be happy bunnies. We want to print in the US, but need to build readership so we can have a decent minimum print run. BUT, with enough US support, I am sure we will be able to print/distribute direct - after all its just 132 PDF files, at the end of the day!
Mine came in the mail today... good job. Magazine looks awesome, I was in a session all day today and haven't read them yet but the quality and pictures are very well done.
Rob
I went to Barnes and Noble and Borders today. The mag is not even on their incoming list yet. The store level knows nothing about it so it will probably be a while b4 it's in the stores
Overall, I'm very impressed with the magazine. The paper stock is very heavy and the photography is well done. The articles are excellent (I'll even overlook the use of an 's' when a 'z' is called for) and do seem to target us 911 people and not Porsche in general.
Looking forward to future issues.
Rob
I've got mine - it looks to be a quality publication, and the spelling is correct.
The front cover car is exactly like mine, except I have Sport Design wheels. Better photos than mine though!
Koenig
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
