53 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWill BruceP and Ben Choi rejoin Rennlist?
Leading reported evidence
Use "pride" and "ben" in the same sentence
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I can't believe you used "pride" and "Ben" in the same sentence.
Leading evidence: 'Use "pride" and "ben" in the same sentence' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'small d' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Use "pride" and "ben" in the same sentence' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
53 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T091508Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I do have to say that this board has gotten a little boring since these two, previously active members are gone.
Bruce would give great intellectual insight and Ben would speak his mind (almost like tourettes) and say things I wanted to, but did not want to offend anyone.
So what do you think the future holds for them?
I predict BruceP will garner enough delegates to win, while Ben Choi will not concede immediately, but instead will drop hints that he would accept the position of Vice President so that in the event BruceP cannot serve out his Rennlist term, Ben would take over the position.
Maybe Ben is just "suspending" his candidancy.
Hopefully he just stays out of the race, the polls showed his popularity continued to drop as the race went on. Most Americans don't want Ben in the White House - 4-8 more years of the same old politics. We need change.
How fitting to see that Ben's biggest 6speed cheerleader is some poor boy band wannabe - sounds like Ben's a good fit there. He's the typical ultra fashionable prima donna, up for any challenge - as long as it's not face to face
I never really understood why Bruce P left.
Can't believe they ban anyone! I get a kick out of some of the post, and one can ignore of skip over anything they don't like. Seems silly to me to exclude either of them.
I can't believe you used "pride" and "Ben" in the same sentence. They're mutually exclusive terms. But, if he's reinstated, he'll be back on the board - toned down at first, then he'll get booted again for some nutso comments.
Some people just like "Urination Contest".....and are not in it for the "Fun" of being in the Porsche community and having all of us enjoy our cars better....best they be gone.....if you want a "soap opera"
turn o the TV and watch "The Young and the Restless"......
geez, get a life folks.......banned from a board should be temporary anyway unless you are a total TOOL. I say give these 2 another chance! I miss the humor and attitudes
While I would agree, and probably, ultimately do agree w/you, the problem with Ben wasn't his sarcastic humor or rudeness. It was his offending other members, saying things that chased people away, or created an environment that was hostile and unhealthy.
He on several occasions attacked or belittled me and it got to the point where I didn't wanna deal with it/him anymore.
He acted like it was his house and he could do/say whatever he wanted. In a public forum, there are rules and an expectation of proper etiquette. He violated both, while alienating many, over and over again.
However, I agree. Ben should be allowed to come back under is assumed name/identity and be a little (a LOT) more respectful of individuals and the community as a whole.
Just my 2
This forum is better without Ben. For the most part he didn’t contribute anything real useful and would insult people just to do it. He can always go play in some other sandbox.
I think you're missing the point - Ben's not coming back, even if he was asked.
And as for the other guy - who the hell knows! - he's probably in therapy with the Oprah crowd.
I think you are all A..holes for kicking F(*&(UYTING a disabled person of this forum..tourettes (or however you spell it) is a very serious F..*&#&T!(*@)Ing illnes.....MOT(*&(#$&F*()Y&ERS....
Internet tourettes is even worse C09we09r8ueSUKER(*^&ers.....
If you know what I mean.
Do I miss his remarks?? NO...Did he ask for it?? YES He had it coming..he wasn' t even funny or sarcastic JUST a pretentious little ***** with a big mouth..a wannabe gangsta.... probably a small D.. and they only way he could make up for this was ragging on P enthusiasts
SAD very SAD
If BruceP and Ben return to this forum because of a popularity contest, then this isn't the Porsche forum that I signed up for. It would become a variation on
Flavor of Love
show again. But, that's not why I'm here. I prefer communicating with smart, articulate, polite people - which is what I usually get here nowadays.
Bob
