18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHey, cracked I cracked a 100
Leading reported evidence
Use "*****-ness" more than you have, at least
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
So I guess I've used my "*****-ness" more than you have, at least for the last 8 months anyway!
Leading evidence: 'Use "*****-ness" more than you have, at least' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test on the m030' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey, I cracked a 100 postings/replies. I guess I'm ready to subscribe! I know, some of you have 2,000+. I just hope that once in a while you get to put your hands on anything other than that keyboard...or that your boss appreciates all the *work* you are doing for the company!
Geert
Probably so and I wear that badge with honor!......and I have to be somewhere next to Kirby, Todd, Chris, Lewis, and few others. Do I smell a poll coming on???
Dell - no I didn't. I haven't logged on to aol today. I'll check it now.
BTW, sorry to hear about your clutch problem. But I think I have figured out the cause of your problem. It's either the PSE or the ROW M030. Why don't you remove the PSE and send them to me. I'll check them out for you for a couple of years. If I don't have any clutch problems after two years then we'll know it was not the PSE that caused your clutch problem... we'll have to try the same test on the M030....
Yes you ARE! However, you joined in December of 2003 and have 1,250-ish posts. I joined in April of 2005 and have 960. So I guess I've used my "*****-ness" more than you have, at least for the last 8 months anyway!
Sorry all, Paul is a ***** too! Don't know what I was thinking forgetting to include Paul in my last post. Brain fart I guess........be right back, need to pour another Grey Goose and soda
that's great! you are stepping up and becoming a registered member at 100 posts whereas there are CHEAPSKATES with 1000s of posts who troll this board, post all day long and still can't justify the registration
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
