21 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHsequential shift 996
Leading reported evidence
Install (on a 996tt)
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
We also have a sequential shifter that was codeveloped with Cartronic (almost identical units) and I have had the chance to drive one of our customers cars with the kit installed (on a 996TT).
Leading evidence: 'Install (on a 996tt)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install (on a 996tt)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The web page doesn't mention any clutch replacement, so I am assuming you still need to depress the clutch to change gears.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You still need to use the clutch for smooth shifting.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
On the downshifts, you need to use the clutch (most of the time), but the shifts are still faster than a H pattern shifter.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
uh I am pretty sure you have to still use the clutch it is just a sequential shift style
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Install (on a 996tt)
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
We also have a sequential shifter that was codeveloped with Cartronic (almost identical units) and I have had the chance to drive one of our customers cars with the kit installed (on a 996TT).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
21 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
We also have a sequential shifter that was codeveloped with Cartronic (almost identical units) and I have had the chance to drive one of our customers cars with the kit installed (on a 996TT). He has the upgraded electro-magnetic one which makes the shifting much easier. I personally enjoy driving the 6speed and would not put this unit in my car, but this has nothing to do with the unit just my honest personal prefference. The customer is in love with the unit however and would not have it any other way. I have included some pictures of his shifter before it went into the car.
We are looking to get some more of these units out there so we are willing to sell this unit for $3515, it normally retails for $4750. This is just over our cost and like I said we are only doing this to get a couple more units out there in the market.
Am I right in assuming that this is not a clutchless shifter like BMW's SMG? The web page doesn't mention any clutch replacement, so I am assuming you still need to depress the clutch to change gears. Why is this better than a stick shift, esp. when executing 5-2 downshifts? Can you even blip the throttle while downshifting? What about double-clutched downshifts?
Yes you are correct. Like I said I personally do not like this better then a stick but others do
... Reasons I am told are, no chance of missing a shift, quicker downshifting, etc... I don't see why you couldn't blip or double clutch, its just like the stick but up and back instead of the gate pattern.
Hope this helps..,
How does the sequential shift go into neutral to allow you to double-clutch and blip? And how do you do a 5-2 double-clutched rev-matched downshift with this sequential shift?
It just seems silly to put in a sequential shifter if you don't automate the clutch and blip the throttle for you between downshifts. That's the whole beauty of having a true sequential shifter - that you can hit the downshift stick (or paddle) 2 or 3 times in a row and know that the system will automatically put you in the right revs not to upset the drivetrain and balance of the car, esp. when you are cornering.
Ok, I honestly have no idea what you are getting at. Both things you have mentioned (bliping and double clutching) are done the exact same way as in a car with a stock gated shifter...I am not sure if you do things differently, but when I down shift and double clutch I don't shift into neutral I put my foot on the clutch
. I mean no offense by this post so please do not take it that way, I am just kind of confused by what you are getting at
Just as the SMG or F1 systems you can tap the shifter back 3 times and downshift from 5th to 2nd and blip while doing this...it would still be quicker then a regular stick because you are "taping" the shifter quickly instead of throwing the shifter from 5th to 2nd.
Like I have said I personally do not like this better then my stick, however not for the reasons you are pointing out as they can be done in the same way (and quicker) as a normal shifter.
Basically it only works in replacing the gate- instead of the six speed h style you just go forward and back. I am sure there is probably a neutral spot between 1st and r if you go all the way down. It does nothing more than change the way you shift everything else is the same, unless I am missing something.
You still need to use the clutch for smooth shifting. This "sequential" shifter loses the lateral motion of the classic H-pattern shift gate. That's it. AND it uses electromagnetic assist to ease the force needed to work the stock shifter cables into gear. But you still need to use the clutch... just try doing a smooth 4-3 shift in your 6-speed without using the clutch.
To achieve the 5-2 rev matched downshift, I would assume that you simply depress the clutch and blip while doing a quick double push on the sequential shifter. Is that really any easier than doing a 5-2 through an H-gate?
I can see this unit decreasing the incidence of missed shifts, but without automated clutch and throttle modulation, I really don't see the benefit of this unit, but each to his/her own!
Perhaps the $4k will allow you to miss a few less gears...
Cheers!
Okay, I understand how this works now. I still think it's silly, since you increase the chance of over-revving the engine if you lose count of how many times you tap the lever to downshift. A real SMG would not allow you to over-rev.
BTW Evan, not sure if we're double-clutching the same way. When I double-clutch, I lift off the clutch when I'm in neutral to blip.
I agree, the main benefit of the SMG-type shifter (i.e. no clutch and automated rev-matching) is not present in this system. Regardless, what's the point of double-clutching
I thought that synchros had rendered the practice obsolete
The RT2000 car I drove at Skip Barber had a sequential shifter.
It works just like a motorcycle gearbox. When you pull on the lever, you go up one gear. When you push on the lever, you go down one gear. In neutral, a light comes on.
The main advantage in that you do not have to push in the clutch during upshifts. Just lift off the throttle, pull on the stick, and back on the power. It takes very,very little time to upshift.
On the downshifts, you need to use the clutch (most of the time), but the shifts are still faster than a H pattern shifter.
As far as double clutching goes, it is completely unnecessary and a waste of time. Modern gearboxes with synchros do not require it at all.
That being said, I like the H pattern (with shortshifter) in my streetcar, and would prefer a sequential only in a race car.
Guys,
I feel like we are fighting on the same team
.
I said I dislike the unit and you guys are arguing that you dislike it....its not really arguing its agreeing
Some people like it, some don't just like any product out there...I may work for the company but I personally dislike it (being totally honest). Like I said I have one customer that loves it and would not have the car any other way...he swears by it...
To each his own
I believe the Cartronic sequential was originally developed in Czechoslovakia. Apparently, some parts are now manufactured in Germany, although assembly takes place in the Czech Republic.
There was a recent article in Excellence about this "SQS" shifter.
Example going from 4th to 3rd
Off the gas
Clutch in
Shift into neutral
Clutch out
Blip the throttle
Clutch in
Shift into the 3rd
Clutch out
Back on the gas.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.