7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 C2 01 power prob
Leading reported evidence
Replace under warranty
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
have in mind that car has been serviced from new ALWAYS in an OPC and had once and RMS leak @ 35.000 klms replaced under warranty.
Leading evidence: 'Replace under warranty' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace under warranty' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You mentioned that you had run 3 tests with the PSE on and 3 with it off.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
test 2 : PSE ON ( loud ) blue curve, car shows 291.8 ps / 214 KW @ 7455 and
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all,
I own a 996 C2 o1 300ps with PSE manual.
just about few hours ago i dynoed my car with
test 2 : PSE ON ( loud ) blue curve, car shows 291.8 ps / 214 KW @ 7455 and
test 3 : PSE OFF ( silent ) green curve, car shows 283.9 ps / 208.8 KW @ 7419 RPM
besides the PSE car is totally stock air filter stock as well
car has 92.500 klms on the clock
question now:
1. porsche states that PSE do not affect power . why there are two different max powers then? ( have in mind i have dynoed the car 6 times 3 PSE on & 3 OFF)
2. why there is a drop in power in both cases around 6000 rpm?
3. with PSE on ( loud)TEST 3 car shows 291.8 ps / 214 KW @ 7455, it should reach max power around 6800 rpm according to the manual.
4. max with PSE on ( loud)TEST 3 is 320 NM @ 4966 rpm and should be 350 NM @ 4600 rpm. why?
5. has any of you a dyno chart with a. stock exhaust b. PSE on c. PSE off to compare?
I need help in terms of thoughts or possible probs.....
anything will be appreciated
if you need more feedback on details let me know and I will answer them all
have in mind that car has been serviced from new ALWAYS in an OPC and had once and RMS leak @ 35.000 klms replaced under warranty.
thanks in advance
harris
thanks in advance
I noticed the dip at 6200 before I had my GIAC program installed. The same dip is in the dyno graph in the manual I believe and on GIAC's dyno's on their web site. It's almost a clear signature that you are looking at a real 996 dyno graph.
I still notice the dip now but it's not as noticeable as it was when I was stock.
I don't understand what you mean in question #4.
all I mean in Question 4 is that HP power is close what posrche claims...but torque is far away compare to what it should be.
it is 320 NM @ 4966 rpm and should be 350 NM @ 4600 rpm.
can anyone explain why?
You mentioned that you had run 3 tests with the PSE on and 3 with it off. Was the difference between the two always about the same? What order were the runs made in?
I'm going to assume Porsche's HP and TQ numbers are to the "crank" and your numbers are to the "wheels". Crank HP and TQ should be higher than wheel hp and TQ because Crank measurements are just measuring the power from the engine it doesn't include the drivetrain loss when the engine is actually connected to a car.
