20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTequipment Rear Spoiler?
Leading reported evidence
Install on cab aero packages
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
That spoiler is typically installed on cab aero packages.
Leading evidence: 'Install on cab aero packages' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust ride height' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Do you have any pictures of your adjusted ride height?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
PSS10s even at a moderately stiff setting seemed much better to both my wife and to me.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
That is the "standard" widebody aerokit. It really only consists of the extra deep front splitter and the wing in the pic I posted.
Standby, I have a 996 Teq catalog that I will scan and post the pic for you.......
UPDATE.....SEE ATTACHED PIC.....
I have to give credit where credit is due. I thought Benjamin Choi did a good job modding the exterior on his C4S and only parts of it is OEM.
Ideas here:
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...4s-thread.html
I really like the look and flow of the stock wideness, but would maybe like a
little
more emphasis on the rear; IDK The stock C4S aero I like, but not crazy about the front lip.
Agreed on all counts. Need to do some exhaustive research to execute 1.0"~1.5" drop and still maintain the current stock and wife-friendly ride characteristics.
ROW M030
H&R Street-Perf. Coil-Over
Bilstein PSS10
Thanks all for the spoiler feedback!
Hi! Another C4S here (2003). Personally, I felt the stock ride a little on the harsh side. Our roads up here are not the the best (putting it politely). PSS10s even at a moderately stiff setting seemed much better to both my wife and to me. They seemed to dampen the bumps better rather than transmit everything up our spines. Drop is adjustable, but we went down about 1.5in in front and 1 in rear ending up with a level ride but still come room so that I don't hit the stops around town.
Tweeking tire pressure (another controversial topic to liven up the thread) also makes a big difference.
Jon, this sounds promising. Do you have any pictures of your adjusted ride height? Actually, we're out of scope for this thread; just PM me a link if you have one.
There is a small ram air flow scoop at the front of the tail's base - that would redirect air back into the intake. It's not nearly as significant as the ram intake scoops on the newer GT3 wings, but there's definitely something there.
To the O.P., the combination of the 4S aerokit's rear wing and front spoiler do make a very noticable difference to the car's feel at speed. The aerokit gives both front and rear axels very slightly negative lift coefficients, and the result is very nice both on track and on highway. I do recommend doing the whole aerokit, and not just part of it.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
