27 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew Owner, Intermediate Shaft Bearing Question
Leading reported evidence
Check on this one
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Forget the OEM replacement, if you are going to do an upgrade check on this one:
Leading evidence: 'Check on this one' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check on this one' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
If not I'll have the plugs replaced, oil changed, filters etc.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
If not I'll have the plugs replaced, oil changed, filters etc.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi,
I own a small used car dealership and deal mainly in late model European cars still under factory warranty. But, I just bought a black on gray 2002 911, tiptronic, with 60k miles, comfort seats, soft look leather, advanced technic package, and 18" 5 star wheels that I don't know the name of (options sheet says RAD wheels). It's my first Porsche. The 997 has really been catching my eye but once I saw this black beauty and the reasonable price, I jumped on it. It was a CPO car up until late last year so I'm hoping most of the major issues that I read about have been taken care of. My biggest concern is the Intermediate Shaft bearing. I read on the Ultimate Preowned 996 Buying Guide on here that the factory has a replacement bearing and update for the shaft. Is that something that should preemptively done or would that be cost prohibitive? I plan on putting it through the shop and seeing if the 60k service appears to have been completed or not. If not I'll have the plugs replaced, oil changed, filters etc. done. Ultimately I bought it for resale, but the real reason I bought it was to satisfy the urge to own a 911 that I've had since I was 16!
Great forum, I've learned alot from looking through all the posts.
Forget the OEM replacement, if you are going to do an upgrade check on this one:
http://www.lnengineering.com/ims.html
Some IMS go for 100,000+ with no problems, others are bad with only a few miles. There are lots of posts on this. Doesn't seem to make alot of difference on maintenence, etc. That why you will see some go bad with only a few miles on the engine, and others go forever. Really a bad design. The LN upgrade is the only way to go if you are going to upgrade at all.
"...should be preemptively done..."? As you've seen in other threads, there's no consensus on that. It's a roll of the dice. I would do it - did do it - but I'm like that. The cost is a fraction of a year's depreciation, to put it in perspective. I like sleeping better. Other guys have more nerve or common sense than I do.
"...cost prohibitive..."? In my opinion, no. Around here, it's north of two grand to do the upgrade. Not bad for a Porsche. If you need to do anything else in there, like a clutch or RMS, it becomes a bargain because a lot of the labour is redundant, which is how a good indy would charge for it.
If it were me, and I was in love with this car and planned to drive it for awhile, I'd open 'er up, do the IMS bearing, update the RMS and eyeball the clutch while I'm in there. Pay it forward for the pleasure of driving the car.
That's one opinion, anyway. Good luck!
Ok, so another IMS question..which I'm not sure it's been raised previously or not..
How many IMS Failure have we seen on LN Engineering IMS upgraded engines?
Two issues.
1. Probably too new on the market to even see this yet. And the numbers are small.
2. If there are any failures, do you think that number would be public knowledge?
Again, have you talked directly to Charles at LN or Jake at Flat6 to get any of your questions answered?
In all the posts here and on other Porsche sites I have never seen one that had a failure on an LN Bearing, or on one of Jake's rebuilt engines. And we see posts on other failures almost everyday. I would think that if someone had a failure on one of these we would hear about it really quickly,
This fall, in great frustration, I traded my gorgeous but endlessly troublesome Range Rover in on its exact opposite: A Toyota truck. I need something when we're in the country that will start and go, all the time every time, no matter what the conditions. And, of course, I then started trolling Toyota truck message boards to accelerate my learning curve. Let's just say I learned two things: The internet amplifies complaints like a Marshall stack. And there are no guarantees in life, other than the obvious.
Th effectiveness of the IMS retrofit program is currently 100%..
I have had ONE engine failure occur with a purchaser.. When the oil pump drive snapped in half due to the insane throttle response of the engine while on the track. At the time that was our highest output engine and we now have a chromoly, totally overkill replacement for the pump drive that snapped and EVERY engine gets one.
Build enough high output engines and you'll have parts scatter.. Nothing I create is stock, so things will break when we are making big power. The engine had no warranty, but I insisted to repair it for free, which meant a full re-creation... The client was a real sport and was more than understanding.
We now have serialized door decals for the IMSR procedure to validate cars that have had it applied.. People already started lying about having the procedure done and this keeps everyone honest since we log VIN info, stamp each bearing flange and also log the engine serial number so it can be tracked infinitely during service.
I've seen cars advertised as having the IMS bearing upgrade, but dig a little and they mean that the RMS has been replaced. Most "normal" people just don't understand the difference.
Yes, most sellers and buyers both do not know the difference, BUT on a few occasions people have stated that their IMS was retrofitted with our procedures when it had not been. Both these occasions were cars that had been listed for sale by car dealers.
We know where every bearing has been sold and each one is serialized and logged with the engine ID from the engine it was fitted to and the car.
This mis-representation has occurred on a few occasions and we decided to make it much more difficult for future attempts to be successful.. This will keep everyone more honest.
Jake, I assume you mean every bearing sold by you. I bought mine directly from LN Engineering, and from our earlier conversations I'm going to assume you have no record of those.
I think this is an important clarification. If I ever sold my car, someone might assume that since you have no record of the IMS bearing upgrade for my VIN, I'm lying, when in fact I simply bought it from the manufacturer and had it installed elsewhere.
Yes, only the bearings we have sold are seeing this procedure.. Charles at LN is doing something similar but hasn't implemented it yet.
Charles has a database of who bearings have been sold to as well. I am sure he could verify it easily if need be.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.