55 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHanyone actually use 93 octane gas?
Leading reported evidence
Run 100/91 mix
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have run a 100/91 mix, but it's costly and I have to burn almost 2 gallons just to get to the gas station that has 100 and back.
Leading evidence: 'Run 100/91 mix' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust accordingly' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can run 91 and the car will adjust accordingly.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Fixed Base Operators (they pump the fuel at the airport) drain off a considerable amount of fuel every day from the trucks to check for water.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not to change the direction of the thread, but since we are on the topic of fuels (and aviation fuels), if any of you use a kerosene heater in the winter there is a better alternative.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not to change the direction of the thread, but since we are on the topic of fuels (and aviation fuels), if any of you use a kerosene heater in the winter there is a better alternative.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
55 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I can only find 91 so if I could locate 92 I would go with it and definitely go with 93 it is was around also. Now I would want to stick to a reputable brand also, I like Union 76, then Chevron.
boooo
You would think we would here in California too with all of the refineries around, especially where I live, but we don't. But if anyone in the S.F. bay area knows of a station with 93 let me know
In California, the best way to get 93 is to mix 3:1 of 91 and 100 gas. This is what I do. There is a Union 76 on Almaden Expressway in San Jose that sells 100 gas.
California prohibits the sale of higher than 91 octane for large production. You can purchase 100 in very rare locations.
In the San Jose, CA area it's the 76 at Almaden Expressway and Foxworthy.
.....Or....go buy five gallons of Toluene at Sherwin Williams and add a gallon to a tank...there's a forumula for adding X amount to bump up the octane. I run a bit Toluene in every tank of gas in my 930 to keep it from detonating when it gets hot around here.
Remember though...it's highly volatile so watch how and where you store it. I think straight toluene is 114 octane. Here's an interesting article on the subject that I found very informative and useful:
http://www.elektro.com/~audi/audi/toluene.html
.
My apologies in advance if it's a reprint from a previous post somewhere.
Chuck
Check out Street Blaze, street legal fuel from *VP Racing Fuels in San Antonio, official fuel supplier of the ALMS, btw:
"Oxygenated with ethanol, this CARB-legal fuel is specifically engineered for high-performance street cars including sport compacts, muscle cars, street rods and more. It's environmentally friendly and street legal throughout the U.S. In applications with anything from 4- to 12-cyclinders or engines equipped with a turbocharger, supercharger or nitrous oxide system (NOS), StreetBlaze 100 will generate optimum power and performance. In turbocharged or supercharged applications, it allows an increase in boost without fear of detonation. NOS users can also leverage their higher octane ratings to step up to a more powerful nitrous oxide system. Dyno tests with a turbocharged application proved StreetBlaze100 generates up to 14% more horsepower compared to premium grade 91 octane unleaded gasoline. Designed for use in cast-iron head engines with CRs up to 13:1 and aluminum head engines up to 14:1. Works well on the latest generation of electronically-controlled turbo engines. Contains no metal compounds and won't harm catalytic converters or oxygen sensors."
� Color: Orange
� Oxygenated: Yes
� Motor Octane: 96
� R+M/2: 100
� Specific Gravity: .746 at 60� F
VP RACING FUELS LINK
They even ship it to you...
Oh, yes, I use 93 Octane... so as not to hijack the thread!
Kim
*no affiliation... fuel info provided as a renne bene - fee free!
I have never heard of the stuff and I live in San Antonio. Family uses VP for the drag cars. We used to have a Shell station that sold 110 octane (well, there is no such thing as octane over 100, it is called heptane) striaght out of the pump.
Interesting, I will have to investigate.
A bear and a rabbit are ****ting in the woods.
The bear looks over to the rabbit and says "does **** stick to your fur?"
The rabbit says smuggly "nope, not my fur."
So the bear wiped his *** with the rabbit.
Im in San Jose.. so to fight the 91 Octane deal, I tried using an Octane Booster once.. huge difference at the low end. Usually my car is really weak around 14 mph or less in second gear, with the boost I had much more power around there.
Also, at high RPMs the engine sounded much much nicer, like it was happy to be there.. where as with 91 it sounds freaking pissed off.
I have also heard about Foxworthy and Almaden.. I have to make a trip there. I've heard of racing gas at a Unocal 76 around Redwood City as well.
Tippy,
Their tech director is a good resource for any questions, as well:
VP TECHNICAL DIRECTOR
"If you have a technical question regarding VP's fuels, traction adhesives or other products, you may click on the link above to send an email with your question directly to VP's Technical Director. Please give a brief description of your application along with your question(s). You may also call VP's Technical Department at [phone removed], between 8 a.m. - 10 p.m EST, seven days a week. Note that nontechnical questions related to pricing, dealer locations, etc. should be directed to the appropriate VP Regional Office."
Click on the 'contact us' on their home page:
VP RACING FUELS HOME PAGE LINK
Let me know the results of your investigative work!
Kim
For automobiles maybe. For aircraft no. There is 130 Octane fuel available in aviation. It is dyed green in color where the 100LL is blue. It is measured in a slightly different matter however. It is an index which assumes a supercharged or rich mix condition. 130 is hard to obtain however, often aquired for occasions such as sanctioned air races like Reno. Majority of these WWII era aircraft are supercharged.
Important caution regarding 100LL.
The "LL" stands for low lead. This means it has a low lead content
in relation to other aviation fuels
. However in comparison to automotive unleaded it has a fair amount of lead and probably not a good idea in a car requiring unleaded.
Not to change the direction of the thread, but since we are on the topic of fuels (and aviation fuels), if any of you use a kerosene heater in the winter there is a better alternative. If your local airport can accommodate jet aircraft then you can obtain Jet-A fuel. Much cleaner than kerosene and burns cleaner too. It is a derivative of kerosene and close to diesel#1 so it works great in diesel cars as well. It also will not gel until at least -40 or -56 depending on brand. (I burn a few hundred thousand gallons of Jet-A per year...the way it was intended to be
)
You may even get a hell of a deal. Fixed Base Operators (they pump the fuel at the airport) drain off a considerable amount of fuel every day from the trucks to check for water. This fuel is considered contaminated even though there will likely be no water present. You may be able to take this off their hands for little or nothing.
This is also the case with 100LL aviation fuel but it usually ends up in the fuel tanks of the airport equipment.
Sorry, back to the regularly scheduled program!
I certainly do not doubt your experience, however it does clearly say "130
Octane
" on this fuel when it is delivered. Never a reference to anything resembling "heptane". But then I just fly 'em.
Here is what my search of Heptane turned up:
"The straight-chain isomer n-heptane is the zero point of the octane rating scale. It is undesirable in petrol, as it burns explosively, causing engine knocking, as opposed to branched-chain octane isomers, which burn more slowly and give better performance".
Varies widely. There are numerous aviation search engines where you can see Jet-A being sold today for as little as $2.70/gal up to $6/gal.
Average seems to be around $4.25-$4.75 at midsize to large airports. Then there are discounts of up to 50-75 cents/gal if you buy large quantities (maybe 500-1000gals+).
Price is comparable for 100LL as well. They are usually within 20 cents of each other.
I know, I know.
For those not in aviation; it happens between the pilots and the doctors (mechanics). Sometimes chests get pounded and heads swell a bit (we are born with oversize egos). I am guilty of it.
But rest assured that I have the highest respect for those that work on the piece of aluminum that holds my butt in the air. Many of them are my dear friends and I know they want to see me come home safely as much as I do!
Last time I got some was years ago @ HPN, IIRC...
Uh, unless I have a 'winged receptacle', I will have to pass on the 'high volume discount!'
It was 'concerning enough' surrounded by barrels of VP racing fuel in the hot pit @ Road America's ALMS race...
during the lightening storm!
Thanks!
Kim
No chest pounding.
Just saying we are in the same business, but on different ends.
I am only half right on this topic, it is true that octane stops on a 100 point scale. it is not HEPTANE that goes over 100. I dont know what it is now as I did a quick search to confirm my statement and realized that heptane is on the low end of octane. Sorry for the mis info.
Understood that fully.
It was a caution for anyone who might be thinking it was a source of 100 octane fuel for those Porsche thingys since that was the focal point of this thread.
Thats why I said "probably not a good idea in a
car
requiring unleaded".
Guess we are lucky here in Canada!!!!!! Both PetroCanada and Sunoco actually have 94 octane!!
In my case when I bought my baby about 2 months ago, my first post I mentioned that it had a "bogging down" sensation between 4-5000rpm when accelerating "briskly", that was on the 91 octane premium that I thought was the best I could get....when I discovered the 94 octane, after a few tankfuls the bogging down is completely gone. ( I also wonder whether the computer adapted to the way I drive compared to previous owner that may not have revved it much?? )
Very good caution indeed.
100LL smells goods while running but once your injectors are clogged and the cats are toast, it doesnt smell so good anymore.
You can run it in any carbureted car or bike though.
Well, I never suggested running it in a Porsche. My turbo bike is fuel injected and I have had no problems running the 100LL. Use to run it in the flat bottom, but it got to be too expensive. When I lived in New York, I used to get 95 octane at the Sunoco stations.
mejier around my house sells 100 octane unleaded at the pump.. i always wanted to try it but was scared what you guys think? will if feel a boost in power? will the car run better? will it blow up????
Sunoco 94 here in Canada baby! I use that as much as I can, but if I'm in a pinch and can't find a Sunoco, I just go to Shell, etc as long as its above 90.
Sunoco 93 exclusively - they used to have 94 here in NY but that went away. I do have access to 100 and 105 that I did see a bump from in my chipped TT but I haven't tried it on the 996.
OK, went to my local paint store and not only did they not have anything labeled "Toluene" in the solvent section, the young guy behind the counter didn't know WTF I was talking about. (Big surprise these days).
Does it come labeled any other way? They had Naptha, acetone, ketone(?), and about 5 other solvents, just no toluene. Help?
I won't use it. They achieve their octane rating with methanol. The resulting 94 is a true reflection of its knock resistance, but the engine management system doesn't see it that way. With a lot of cars, my previous Bimmers included, the car ran rich on Ultra 94. You could tell by the soot in the tailpipe.
I'm currently using Shell's premium fuel. Lower octane rating, but no methanol. All my cars run better on it than on Ultra 94, and the mileage is marginally better, too.
If I could buy it in California I would. I have run a 100/91 mix, but it's costly and I have to burn almost 2 gallons just to get to the gas station that has 100 and back.
Welcome to the Socialists Republic of California...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.