13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH6 year olds in back seat without booster?
Leading reported evidence
Install next week
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Car is in desperate need of a suspension upgrade--- x74 is being installed next week
Leading evidence: 'Install next week' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install next week' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Plus, boosters are so easy to use I can't imagine thinking twice about using one.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Can I put my 6 year old twins in the back of my 996 WITHOUT a booster seat? They seems to fit perfectly back there, but wife gives me a hard time. What do you guys do? Thanks.
Gary
The law in California is that a booster is not needed for 6 y/o or 60 lbs, but the recomendation from the child safety group is to keep them in a booster until they are 8. Its OK, but it is safer to be in a booster.
It's my understanding that where the belt rests is the issue. You want them to cross at the shoulder, not any higher, hence the need for the booster seat.
Aahh, just duct tape the kid in and forget about the seat belt....
If god forbid something where to happen that a booster seat could have prevented you will never forgive yourself...get one
I have my 8 year old and 6 year old sit in there with no booster. But it's usually only for short fun drives around town. Long drives usually involve the whole family, and the 6 year old sits in a booster in the minivan
.
Booster is safer; use them... I do. I couldn't deal with the idea if something did happen and I didn't use the booster and the kid got hurt; I'd be killing myself forever. Plus, boosters are so easy to use I can't imagine thinking twice about using one.
Thanks everyone.
P.S. Car is in desperate need of a suspension upgrade--- x74 is being installed next week
. By the way, anyone know how I get this pic into the profile box on the left??? Thanks
depends on where the belt meets the shoulder. My 6 year old just moved out of the booster in the back seat. She still uses it in the front and in the back of other full size cars.
Without the booster the belt was well positioned and her feet were on the floor. All the booster does is lift the kid up a few inches. If the kids fit better in the mini back seats without them then I dont use them. With the low belts in back, a booster could actually position the belt too low. All about fit, not rules.
We use this seat; it appears to be the safest way for kids to travel in a car due to the excellent side impact protection and the seat back adjusts in height so you get a perfect belt fit as the kid grows...
Britax seats...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
