16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhat do you think about these vanity plate ideas?
Leading reported evidence
Check youre state
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I like that one - probably taken, but check youre state
Leading evidence: 'Check youre state' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check youre state' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I was thinking '9WONWON' or '9WUNWUN' would make a cool plate. However, after being ridiculed by one of buddies for coming up with such a corny idea, I'm starting to re-think it.
So what do you guys think? Would either of those plates look corny? What about 'PSM OFF'?
Never mind, after seeing 'PSM OFF' in writing, I realize that the majority of the population would interpret it as **** 'em Off, not Porsche Stability Management deactivated.
i imagine that more cars with vanity plates get keyed than those without.
i had thought about them for my viper but decided it was just too much considering the car.
NVR BXTR is cool, but that would come off as a bit too pompous in my world. I get a lot of grief at the office for having a Porsche. To imply that I have a superior Porsche would be too over the top in my world.
I saw a car in Toronto (BMW) that had a different front vanity plate than the back one...not sure how legal it is but the front one said "BIN TER", the back one was "DON DAT" !!!!!
I had vanity plates while living in CT: "LMT UP," but many a state trooper became "interested" in me more than I needed...so, coming down to FL, I decided to avoid the attention and get the FL "save the panther" plate.
