fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Wet Look!

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWet Look!

Leading reported evidence

Run across it by accident

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Ran across it by accident.

Original post Read captured discussion
Wet Look!
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run across it by accident' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run across it by accident' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 14 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run across it by accident

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Ran across it by accident.

Original post Read captured discussion
Wet Look!
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T150451Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 3Original post

Hey Wael, Car looks sweet! Have you registered with the Porsche Club UAE yet? If not, contact our Secretary on email: [email removed] We are having our next social event on the 29th, dinner at the Fairmont Hotel. Ciao, Johannes E. PR Director Porsche Club UAE

POST 4Original post

I was thiking more along this line when I saw the title of this post... must be the time.

POST 8Original post

no no no ... mine is better and its all original ..... i wont go park infront of someones mansion and take a shot :P

POST 10Original post

I think that's the garage, Doug. The house is big. J

POST 13Original post

I wish I could take credit for the photo and say it is someone I know... but that is not the case. I actually got the photo from someone here in the forum

POST 14Original post

I've seen that picture before. Ran across it by accident. Anyone looking for a higher resolution version, it's at the url below. You'll have to paste the link into the address bar of a new browser window, as the site doesn't allow direct linking. Work Warning and all that. Nudity at the site, although this is just the above picture. http://207.44.134.36:8080/images0/84b.jpg .

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.