Rennlist

Rear Brake Ducts....

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHRear Brake Ducts....

Leading reported evidence

Check pet

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Would have to check PET.
Original post Read captured discussion
Rear Brake Ducts....

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check pet' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check pet' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Set before i go out

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
I'm going to get a set before I go out on the track again.
Original post Read captured discussion
Rear Brake Ducts....

Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check pet

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Would have to check PET.
Original post Read captured discussion
Rear Brake Ducts....

Set before i go out

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
I'm going to get a set before I go out on the track again.
Original post Read captured discussion
Rear Brake Ducts....

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Anyone have any experience with these? Opinions?... its an OEM part * 996-331-127-90 * 996-331-128-90

POST 2Original post

Not required for rear brakes.

POST 3Original post

Interesting. Does the GT3 RS or Cup come with these?

POST 4Original post

I think only the GT2. Would have to check PET. We really don't need these BTW The front brakes do all the work particularly in a track environment.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

yeah... thought so, considering 80% of the stopping power comes from the front brakes...

POST 6Original post

Yeah, I saw those. I'm going to get a set before I go out on the track again. I usually leave the traction control on on the track ( I know, call me featherfoot but I'll blame it on the tires that the TC comes on at 100MPH at Pacific Raceway) which cooks the rear brakes pretty good. I usually have to bleed the rear brakes between sessions and what do you know, only the inside of the rear calipers has bubbles coming out. These ducts should hopefully solve the problem. $68 each at Sunset.

POST 7Original post

Standard parts on 996 GT2 and 996 GT3. At an MSRP of $80 each - In a 996 I doubt your rear brakes get hot enough to need these (IMHO).

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.