fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

ROW M030 - Street/Track Alignment

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHROW M030 - Street/Track Alignment

Leading reported evidence

Run 1.0 front and -2.0 rear

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Anyone running -1.0 front and -2.0 rear?

Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 - Street/Track Alignment
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run 1.0 front and -2.0 rear' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 1.0 front and -2.0 rear' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run 1.0 front and -2.0 rear

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Anyone running -1.0 front and -2.0 rear?

Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 - Street/Track Alignment
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T094842Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I am getting the ROW M030 installed and wnated to get recommendations on how aggressive I can get with camber on a street car that gets tracked 10 times a year. I currently run -0.5 in the front and -1.5 in the rear and haven't noticed excessive wear on my street tires. I run Toyo R-compound at the track and definitely wear the outside shoulders signficantly. Anyone running -1.0 front and -2.0 rear? I would like to try this more aggressive setup but wanted feedback on how it would affect street tire wear. I am doing toe & caster per the factory RoW Sport factory settings. Thanks, John

POST 2Original post

I think -1 would be about the max on the front with RoW 030.

POST 3Original post

My shop maxed my front camber w/my rowm030 and it came to -.6 deg. I don't think you can get much more w/the ride height of the 030. I think this also has something to do with them only getting 7.6deg of caster, which makes the steering a bit heavy...

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I ended up going with -0.7 front and -1.7 rear with 8.2 caster. Now I need to get back to the track to check it out!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.