14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPics from Spring N. GA Mtn run.
Leading reported evidence
Replace pic
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Replace pic' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace pic' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
My detector didn't alert, and I learned later from Christian that the deputy was using X-band, which I had turned off on my detector.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Some of the cars on our run Saturday.
27 cars, great weather, great people.
http://www.pcars.us/viewalbum.php?a=268&start=0
Warning: some are fairly poor quality.
You didn't come up to Morganton with us!
You missed the drama. Les was in front, we had just crested a hill, and ahead about a 1/3 mi, was what appeared to be a jeep parked off the left side and a sedan parked to the right. We had been running 80-100+ for miles. There was no radar alert, but I always slow whenever there is ANYTHING parked off the side of the road.
We slowed to speed limit, then to 30 or so, as the sedan was a Sherriff's cruiser, and he waved Les over to the side. I crept by at about 20mph, thinking the Deputy was gonna wave me over too, but he didn't. Dave and Christian and a couple others had caught up by this time.
Just down the road were temp signs warning of a race up ahead, and another 1/4 mi or so there was a crossing for a mountain bike race.
So, the five or so cars that were with me, we moved past, and I kept the pace around 65 or so. About 5 miles later, here comes Les blasting up to the back of our pack!
When we got to Morganton, of course we had to debrief Les. The deputy asked Les if he knew how fast he was going. Les said no, the deputy told him his radar had him at 80. My detector didn't alert, and I learned later from Christian that the deputy was using X-band, which I had turned off on my detector. Anyway, the deputy told Les to be careful, mindful of the bicyclists, and to watch his speed. (Yeah, right.)
The drive back down was less eventful.
Very cool! Thanks for the pics. I have a new Avatar thanks to Comchek's pictures. We had a blast!!
It was great meeting everyone there...looking forward to the next one.
I missed the last run as well as I had to go back to ATL by noon, but I heard about the "encounter" with the law
