27 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSpeeding Ticket - Advice Needed
Leading reported evidence
Replace street names, etc
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Anyway...NO affiliations with the site..just a happy costumer...cut and pas the letter..change the street names, etc
Leading evidence: 'Replace street names, etc' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace street names, etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Run red light/stop, speeding in school zone (hope not)
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Use it for something more painful, like running a red light/stop, speeding in school zone (hope not), but not a speeding violation you are likely to talk your way out of in court.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The other side of the coin is that you pay the fine, use your "keep the violation off your record" card to take the online traffic school, and pay better attention next time you are playing.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Ivangene, to answer your questions, it was an eight-lane road with a center divider so I may be able to use your method as well.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I presume he paced both of us because we had literally just crossed the bridge and there wasn't room to use radar or laser.
Run red light/stop, speeding in school zone (hope not)
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Use it for something more painful, like running a red light/stop, speeding in school zone (hope not), but not a speeding violation you are likely to talk your way out of in court.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The other side of the coin is that you pay the fine, use your "keep the violation off your record" card to take the online traffic school, and pay better attention next time you are playing.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Well, the inevitable has occurred. After washing my car I decided to go on one of my favorite drives across the GG bridge, up through Marin to Mt Tam and back. Just after crossing the bridge, a motorcycle cop pulled over another motorist and me at the same time. He gave us both speeding tickets for 80 in a 55.
The curious part is that the ticket does not say how the speed was calculated, i.e. radar, laser, etc. I presume he paced both of us because we had literally just crossed the bridge and there wasn't room to use radar or laser.
So a few questions for any lawyers in the group...
1) Can an officer pace two separate cars at the same time and write citations to each?
2) Is it worth showing up in court to see if I can get it thrown out? I have a clean record without a violation in the past 18 months and can probably take a driving class to get take the points off.
Any advice is appreciated.
this link (and 25 bucks) got me out of a ticket over a year ago.....
http://www.ticketassassin.com/
I have been good, but a couple of weeks ago...the village people **** cop got me again...why they have to laser a P-car in when everybody is going the same speed puzzles me...but whatever.... I fight this one as well.
Read the message on the site..what they tell you is that speed limits are advisory in CA, which means that if you feel you were not endangering others you are okay....AND the road has to be surveyed within the last 5 years otherwise it is an illegal speed trap....
Anyway...NO affiliations with the site..just a happy costumer...cut and pas the letter..change the street names, etc
goodluck.
Q: was it a 2 tane or 4 lane road?
Q: was there a solid or broken center line?
reason is, on a 2 lane raod with a broken center line it IS LEAGAL to speed in order to pass another vehicle... if some how that applies, you could have just finished passing and not have slowed back down yet... this has worked for me in the past
GL
cool site
E
The other side of the coin is that you pay the fine, use your "keep the violation off your record" card to take the online traffic school, and pay better attention next time you are playing.
First find out what notes the officer made on the ticket to "tickle" his memory when he might have to show up in court and support his ticket writing reasons.
Damn, wish I had seen this a few months ago.
Another tip that might help is to go to the city works dept and pull a copy of the speed survey that the city used to justify the speed limit on that street.
Good luck!
+100 on Ticket Assassin, that method has gotten me out of 2 tickets plus one more for my wife.
California is the only state that has "trial by written declaration". Very cool deal, you can request another "trial de novo" even if you're found guilty by written declaration.
Check it out, at worst you'll loss $25 but you'll learn a lot!
Don't take the school for a speeding ticket.
Most jurisdictions allow school ONE time in THREE years. Use it for something more painful, like running a red light/stop, speeding in school zone (hope not), but not a speeding violation you are likely to talk your way out of in court.
Just my two cents.
Interesting, I knew you guys would have some good advice - many thanks for the info. I'll see how far I can get with the ticket assassin (hilarious name btw).
Ivangene, to answer your questions, it was an eight-lane road with a center divider so I may be able to use your method as well.
Thanks all!
Damn! I hope you weren't on the bridge - that's a spendy ticket (but the speed limit is not 55, so I think you must have been tagged prior to the bridge - right?)
I said village people cop, because he was bursting out of his antique Chip uniform....had a huge mustache and was driving an old harley...I expected him to stay making the YMCA signs any minute...this is not a joke or even being condescending ...this guy was just a fat sausage in a tooo (way) too tight uniform stuck in the early 80s. Honestly!
Ticket assassin is the best $25 you ever spend for something like this. Spend $25 for the template.....do a trial by declaration. You'll have to send by certified mail or hand deliver. If that is denied ask for a trial de novo and show up in court for the day. I'd say your chances of something breaking down in the process is 90% and you will have saved $200 and learned something about the process long the way. The cop probably will not show up after all that time as you string them along and wait for something to break in the process......this is the gov't we are talking about!
I agree with the above advice for this type of ticket and would definitely agree with getting a DUI specialist if you ever get a serious ticket as those guys live in traffic court and know all the right people to get things thrown out (not a DUI in my case...).
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.