14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH2008 Z06... 1800 miles
Leading reported evidence
Use with only 3k miles
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use with only 3k miles' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use with only 3k miles' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T031046Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I bought my Z06 used with only 3K miles on it. It was a 2001 and I remember seeing it at the dealer when it was new (or one identical to it). I can't remember the MSRP (in the sixties?), but they had a $10,000 premium on it because it was Millenium Yellow. I bought it, I believe, for 40K which means that the guy who traded it in (he bought a Civic for his daughter, apparently) probably got 35K for it two years later. Talk about a hosing. Of course, I got hosed as well when I sold it (couldn't give it away).
It was a blast on the track and quite decent on the street except for an outrageously rough idle and of course, numerous recalls and other typical Chevy crap which is why I sold it a few years later and bought my 996.
Bang for the buck though, you can't beat those cars, especially if you're a track junkie.
Michael
Just like when I bought my 996 (which all in with all my upfront mods was almost this much!, sad) I figured I would lose less money on the car than I would in the market this year. I was right and am GLAD I did it.
