16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnyone bought the G-Timer?
Leading reported evidence
Use peak hold, and only look at it afterwards
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use peak hold, and only look at it afterwards' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use engine dynos, nuff said' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Rob, do you have your permanently mounted or do you use the suction mount?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T133652Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I got one for Christmas, it's pretty cool. Very distracting though, when I first got it I had it on all the time and would try and see how many G's I could pull in my favorite corners. I found myself looking at the G-Tech more then the road. It's a fun toy though.
I just use the suction cups. The windshield has a line going through the center so centering it is easy. If you really wanted to get serious you could put a level on I suppose.
I have the Beltronics version in yellow. Use it all the time. It friction fits in the lower cubby. I use peak hold, and only look at it afterwards. It's a great way to tune suspension, brakes, engine without relying on your "butt-o-meter". It's much more objective
Highly recommended. With that said, anyone want to buy mine? The yellow is too obnoxious for my interior/exterior, and I would like to do a permanent install with a different version since I use it so much.
That's a Homelink hack. 2 garage doors and a gate. The small hole to the right is for the LED. It's wired into switched power so you can't operate it if the top is down. The only downside is you have to operate it by braille at night.
I have another factory key switch that I hacked to do 2 doors, night illumination/dimming, and LED operation indicator. It just wouldn't do the gate since that's a different remote. Hence, garage door hack 2.0.
Rob in WA and c70Pete,
Just curious what kind of G's you guys have been able to pull in corners, braking, etc.
0-60, I can manage a 5.5 on R-compounds. I could probably do a little better, but I just don't want to thrash my clutch, drivetrain (wheel hop), and tires. I've only made maybe 1/2 a dozen runs--just not a lot of places/times I can do this safely.
Sorry, not as fast as you 911 guys
(Mine is a Boxster S.)
It only plugs into the cig lighter. It will log 0-10, 0-20, 0-30, etc., etc., as long as it detects that you are still accelerating. It knows your speed by "integrating" your G's (from accelerometers) over time. Integrate again and you have distance. It cacluates all sorts of things like 60 ft, 1/8 mile, 1/4 mile, etc. There are also numerous configurable settings such as rollout, "squat", body roll, and weight.
I skeptical at first too, it's not black magic - it's incredibly accurate. I know people who have had them at the track for 1/4 sprints and they're in sync. The measure horsepower part is the only feature that's kind of silly. You also have to input the "horsepower factor" (drivetrain loss, and drag). To do this you use a correction factor between the manufacturer's rate hp and the G-timer's calculated peak wheel Hp.
I can't remember what kind of G's I was pulling it's been a awhile since I had it up. I can't remember getting past .91-3 w/out PSM kicking and my heart rate rising.
That's pretty good. I think low 0.9's is about what the magazines are getting on a skidpad, and I'm sure they're abusing the car quite a lot more. I'm always curious how much the extra 2 powered wheels helps in cornering, but I notice you also have RoW M030.
I think Boxster Ses typically get mid-to-high 0.9's in the corner. I have various mods, and I can run it up to about 1.02 to 1.03 on street tires without creating a scene.
I might pick one up as a tuning "tool". Certainly no less accurate then the "gold standard" chassis dyno so many "tuners" hang their hat on.
Real race teams use engine dynos, nuff said. Oh wait that's another thread...LOL
Cheers
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.