14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 C4S vs. 997S
Leading reported evidence
Use on the road in the other 3 seasons
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use on the road in the other 3 seasons' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use on the road in the other 3 seasons' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm not even close to doing something about this, but wondered if other C4S owners had compared both cars and what decision they had made. I still have this irrational(?) feeling that in the Midwest the awd aspect of the C4S is appealing.
Comments? Thoughts?
Are you asking about use in the snow? I don't use my car in the winter, but I heard it's better than some SUV's so long as the snow is not too high.
Use on the road in the other 3 seasons? The 997, S or otherwise, is a progression on the continuing evolution of the 911 towards being a GT car.
Use on the track? The 997S in sport suspension comes pretty darn close to the GT3 performance lap times. Some say it's better. Me, I'm so accustomed to the AWD for track I'd have to learn new techniques with RWD that I'd rather stick with the C4S for now. I may get the 997S as a second fun car, though.
It will get used in the snow, but not deep snow - that's the Audi's job. It may get tracked but that's more of a dream than reality. Every track day so far I've had to cancel due to work commitments, sadly.
Palting said:
"The 997S in sport suspension comes pretty darn close to the GT3 performance lap times. Some say it's better."
I say:
Want to buy a bridge? It's not even close. But if you want the security of electronics to help you go fast (and that's not a bad thing) then go with the C4S/997S.
If you want direct involvement go for the GT3, but no way, no how, no time is a 997 a substitute for the GT3..there is no substitute.
The difficult thing in life is choice!
Well, Colm, I wouldn't buy a bridge, but I keep an open mind. I don't go on blind faith, or at least rarely do.
Disclaimers on accuracy and who's driving nothwithstanding, lap time for the MK2 GT3 at the 'Ring is 7:54, and for the 997S with sport suspension is 7:59. Pretty darn close regardless of who is driving.
Anyway, my statement was a testimonial to the 997S's performance. I was comparing how close the 997 S, a Porsche dedicated for the road, can come to the performance of the GT3, a Porsche dedicated for the track. They are two different animals.
I love my C4S, I think the styling, awd,SPORT SUSPENSION, turbo brakes etc all make one hell of a car. It does need a little more hp. Imagine a C4S with a GT3 engine!
My next car will probably be a 997TT. I don't think the 997s offers enough of a step upward to justify abandoning my C4S at this time. My friend Frayed will chime in to disagree, I'm sure!
I love driving mine in all kinds of crappy weather. In the snow, it does ok, needs snow tires, or I just take the train! I did get stuck in both blizzards last year, my car did make it home when others didn't though, but it wasn't pretty with summer tires!
Palting
Given your response i don't think we have much to disagree about! Never did actually.
In the 997 instance, the lap times are the car!
In the GT3 instance, it's the driver (without aids), and that was the whole point!
Remember, I sold the 996 TT because the overall experience was numbing!
the reason why i told at the beginning of this conversation said that this topic is out of place, was because thase two cars are not comparable at all. they are diffent.
proof of my thought is the fact that after 8-10 replies no one compared the two cars.
we are talking about 997 S Vs GT3
GT3 Vs electronic helps.....
NUr'ring lap times.......
etc...
no one said anything about the absoloute comparisson between the 2 cars.the C4S Vs 997 S
my opinion is that if you are after a posh porsche, you have to take the C4S.
if you are after a track porsche of course there is no other option. GT3.
if you are after a nice new fast less involving car (if electronics are on) then 997 S.
i would buy the GT3 cause it is my time. pure adrenaline
p.s. on the other hand whatever said above, as replies, i have to say that i agree. especially the fact that the 997 S is less involving car, but have in mind that porsche in the end of the day is a car, and it should be civilized as well as other cars, BUT when chance given it should show Its capabilities.....
it would be interesting to find out how a 997 S drives without electronics.....
1) 997S: improved chassis, motor, higher hp., PASM
2) C4S: AWD, no first year production problems, less expensive, and damn sexy.
I'll NEVER trade in my 03 C4S for a 997S, but if I am in the market, i'll certainly consider it.