18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNHTSA IMS registration
Reported or suspected cause
finally addressed
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Would be great if the issue was finally addressed though!
Leading evidence: 'finally addressed' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'finally addressed' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
This might be what we were waiting for to decide if the IMS problem is a myth or a reality!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I thougt that I would pass this along to all of you as well. Doing some research for another forum I have found out that from 1998 to date there were only 9 registered IMS failures on the NHTSA website for all 996/997 models, and only 13 for all 986/987 models.
We are encouraging everyone who has had an engine failure to go to the NHTSA's website, and register a complaint with them about the faulty design. The NHTSA needs to have so many complaints on file before they can launch an investigation, and force Porsche to issue a recall for faulty engines. Just fill out the form, and make sure to include the vin number of the vehicle involved.
may be a direct link to the page in question would help.
I think that is a great idea that has not been brought up here. I have read many IMS threads and no mention of the NHTSA... I think it is time to act
October 21, 2009 I had a detailed conversation with a representative of the agency that called me up out of the blue. He has contacted me twice since then, but I have not heard anything from him in quite some time.
Not exactly sure, but I think this is the page to file a complaint on.
https://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/Vehicl...nt/index.xhtml
If you search for "Porsche" etc. there is no direct result related to IMS failures. Maybe if enough owners do file a complaint there would be something more specific.
Yup, that's the page :
https://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/Vehicl...nt/index.xhtml
Here are some guides on what information to include :
http://news.consumerreports.org/cars...fecar-gov.html
http://www.edmunds.com/car-safety/ho...r-vehicle.html
Everyone who's had an M96 problem (not just IMS) should fill it out, it only takes a few minutes.
would be great if people from rennlist would report here when they fill up the report so we can follow up what is going into their system
This might be what we were waiting for to decide if the IMS problem is a myth or a reality!
No way there is a time limit AFAIK. Ford just recalled their F150 now 3 or 4 generations old truck due to an issue with gas tank. If safety is involved, it can be recalled.
http://www.torquenews.com/106/ford-r...ank-fire-risks
8/1/11
"The 1.1 Ford and Lincoln trucks being recalled include certain
1997-2004 F150
pickups, 1997 -1999 F250 models with a gross vehicle weight rating less than 8,500lbs, 2004 F150 Heritage models and 2002-2003 Lincoln Blackwood pickups. Not only does this recall specifically apply to those
trucks built between June 20th 1995 and August 4th, 2004
, but it also specifies that this new Ford truck recall applies to trucks originally sold or currently registered in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachussetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Washington DC."
Of course that could have been derived from FORD and not NHTSA.
I imagine this issue is something that a class action suit would need to be raised against Porsche to resolve, similar to the subframe crack issues on the e46 BMWs.
Would be great if the issue was finally addressed though! Crossing my fingers...
How about those of us with intermix, mine from a cracked head? Not an IMS failure, but there are more than a few of us out there.
It has been hard to know the frequency of these sorts of failures due to Porsche's policies. In the early years, particularly under warranty they just replaced the engines and never disclosed what the cause of the failures were. More recently they still required the core of the engine, etc.
It would seem that under a class action suite Porsche could be forced to disclose this sort of information as part of the discovery process.
I would think it needs to be a "safety" issue.......and not just a design/failure issue.
Meaning yeah, the IMS failure exists, but how many of these have actually caused a safety issue or bodily injury(other than having to remove a body part to pay for a new engine rebuild)
Well maybe it is:
Think about a blown engine stranding you in the left lane of a busy 3\4 lane highway with 9 qts of fresh oil behind you. How many cell phone tote'n soccer moms with a car full of kids sliding into you will it take before they notice the accidents in front of them or the oil causing more accidents?
Wow, that's a dose of reality (potential) for you.
Sony has an ongoing issue with all DLPs sold regardless of the year. They are offering replacements at unreal prices. So a recall on my 99 might just happen...
Well, anything is possible. I was just trying to get everyone with a failure motivated to file a complaint so that we can get something accomplished, and within a timely manner. I'm hoping that an investigation does get started, and a recall issued. After that, any class action lawsuits will be left up to those that had to pay for their engine replacements.
I read that it took only 17 complaints for Lotus to issue a recall on their Elises. I forget if it was for oil consumption, or sludge, but at least something was done.