26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHJust did the Orange Cap Mod
Leading reported evidence
Test on an air box
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I remember that Excellence did a test on an air box that actually lost HP.
Leading evidence: 'Test on an air box' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test on an air box' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
It made no difference in sound, but I have fairly loud GHLs on.
I didn't expect much for a free 5 min mod but I really does make it sound much better. My only question is whether or not the cap will stay put. I am concerned that the cap is going to get sucked in to the engine somehow. Which way is the air pulling on the cap? If it's towards the intake, which is my guess, I'm not sure that its secure enough to stay in place forever.
I doubt that there is enough pressure in the intake track to suck it in, especially since it would have to go arround a bend to get in the engine. What the mod does is to block off air going into the air box muffler. This mod give you a more throatty intake sound and the air that is blocked off is resonance air thus not under much pressure. I have done some more soficticated mods by taking out the muffler and putting in place a PVC pipe and cap to block off the tube. Removing the the muffler is suppose to give more volume in the airbox. The best improvement is to remove the plastic screen in front of the MAF.
i've had my cap in for 6-mos. i pulled it out a few days ago, it still looks sturdy. it's a lot cheaper than the fabspeed bypass, which in my mind, does nothing more than what this *free* mod does.
Makes me feel better that people have had it for a while with no ill effects. I can tell you I definitely don't want to give up the sound, it's awesome.
Jetskied - do you have any pics of what you did? I have been thinking about how I could improve on the mod a little and it seems like you have already done it.
I've had mine in for over 1.5 years and looked at it last week. It looked like new and was still as "soft" as the day I put it in. I was concerned that over time the plastic would dry out and it hasn't.
What I did was to take out the top of the air box out of the car. Look inside towards the MAF and you will see a plastic screen. It is snaped in and you can pry it out carefully. This is the same thing that a Fabspeed mod does. Then there is a small trapazoid box( muffler) item screwed to the inside of the lid with 3 screws. You can remove it. Buy some 1 1/2 inch PVC pipe and a cap for it at a hardware store. Glue the cap to one end and cut the pipe so it will fit out of the hole left by removing the muffler. On the muffler there is a o ring you can reuse on the pipe, this will help keep the airbox better sealed. The pipe is sort of small and you can wrap electric tape to thicken it up so it will fit the hole a little more snug. You need to wrap the tape about 7 or 8 times. Put the lid back on and the hose clamp will hold in the pipe.
FWIW, I tried this last year and removed it after a week. I have PSE, so the sound difference wasn't that noticeable on acceleration, and the thing I didn't like was it caused the wonderful PSE gurgle on deceleration to go away.
removing the screen in front of the MAF will screw up the MAF readings. The screen smooths the airflow that's turbulent before it hits the MAF sensor.
This is pretty funny, because these types of mods have been around for ages. Starting with removing the 'snorkel' in my VW Jetta airbox. End result was absolutely nothing except potentially screwing up computer calibrations regarding the MAF.
In the S4, it was about drilling holes in the airbox. I find this thread amusing that you're willing to pretty much void warrantees for a non-existent gain of that 1 hp holy grail on a 80K+ machine.
"... I find this thread amusing that you're willing to pretty much void warrantees for a non-existent gain of that 1 hp holy grail on a 80K+ machine"
void the warranty if it gets sucked in? i don't think it's possible.
there's no power 'gain' as it were...it improves induction sound, for which the bypass was desiged to mitigate. blipping the throttle on heel-toe downshifts is far easier to discern now, especially w/ the radio blarring. i had mine w/ and w/o ghl exhaust, with both, the cap mod only enhanced the pleasure
The mod I did is suppose to be similar to what Fabspeed kit is, but I really notice more sound than real performance. The butt dyno does not feel anything. Fabspeed claims that their mods improves mid range power by saying that the sweep from 3k to 6k rpm was a few tenths quicker. What ever that means, I believe that no air box can really improve on the OE. I remember that Excellence did a test on an air box that actually lost HP. I'll try and find the article.
could you not make your own cap?
i.e. cut a carboard circle, cover the entire surface area with duck tape and call it a day?
wouldn't that work just the same? or am i missing something here...
I did the orange cap last week. It made no difference in sound, but I have fairly loud GHLs on.
However, after 150 miles of the orange cap mod, my CEL came on this morning and the car hunts for idle. Coincidence? Assuming the MAF needs replacing. 99 996 with 13.5k miles.
Steve
99 996
76 930
64 356C
62 356B
00 M5
Someone in UK wanted the orange caps but Niagara wouldn't send them out of the US. Well, I've got them, but I can't fine the email to send them to. Help!
I've got the GHL Loud Exhaust, and I just did the orange cap mod two days ago.
My impression....It's awesome!
I felt like the GHL Loud sounds a little ricy sometimes... Around 6000+ RPM it would be loud, but almost sounds like a tearing or ripping sound. Now, the car feels like it sounds a little deeper, and definitely a lot "cleaner". The revving sound is a lot smoother without any roughness around the edges.
My parents were really critical of my exhaust, but they claim it sounds a lot better now.
I am definitely keeping it on!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.