8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMy 996 w CCW 14 / Toyo R888s
Leading reported evidence
Run 10.5" 46et rear
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I ran 10.5" 46et rear which would effectively be a 11" 53et rear so that is about 20mm total compared to the 11" 63et CCW.
Leading evidence: 'Run 10.5" 46et rear' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 10.5" 46et rear' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Run the Ghetto setup for Auto-X...for open tracking I think you'll find the 255/295 combo is really good on the car.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It seems to stick out further than I remember when I had a set mounted.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
BTW: how did you loose track using the wider GT3 rims they are 18x11 ET63 correct?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T011819Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Here a pic of my CCW 14 rims (GT3 offset) I got from Lt Ramos this past month. Thx Joe, the rims are superlight compared to my Gemballas.
The offset is not aggressive enough for me with 255/295 tires. I lost 20mm of rear track width.
Here's a picture of a OE Boxster 9" rim with 275 rubber. No spacer needed. Currently -1.8 neg camber so with more camber dialed in it should tuck into the wheelwell nicely.
Here's the difference between a 255 and 275 r888 tire on a 9" rim.
I am going to try out the 275/295 rubber at this coming weekend's AX and see how it performs. For the track I think I will stick with the 255/295 combo until they wear out then switch over to 275/315s.
I assume you mean the 275 Boxster S rim? Porsche actualy do not make a Lobster Claw rim wider than 18x9". I haven't weighed it yet. I initially was going to put together a inexpensive 'ghetto' track setup with an OE 9" front and CCW rears.
The CCWs are light, someone posted the figures before on Rennlist. They weigh in the low 20#s. Cost is 2600-2700 new. The CCW 9" with a 45et doesn't leave a lot of inner clearance. I'll probably mount a 5-7mm spacer down the road after my next alignment.
I actually meant the CCWs. I need to do more research, man tracking a 996 looks like it's going to be a lot more expensive. W/the BMWs, you just throw on a set of Kosei's and call it a day... Less than $1k, and 17lbs a piece. You got to pay to play though...
Ahmet -->Misses 16 inch R comps and prices of the 944 Turbos :'(
Spring,
What are the offsets on the Boxster 9"? ... It seems to stick out further than I remember when I had a set mounted. Was thinking of mounting a 275 on a 17x9.5 maybe your offset # will confirm what I am thinking or steer me away.
BTW: how did you loose track using the wider GT3 rims they are 18x11 ET63 correct? That is pretty agressive already, what did you have before?
The CCW14s look fantastic!
Run the Ghetto setup for Auto-X...for open tracking I think you'll find the 255/295 combo is really good on the car.
Are your CCW's an 8.5' front or 9' front?
Andy
18x9 43et on -1.8 camber. With more neg camber it 'should' fit right into the wheelwell. There really is almost no inner clearance. Probably mount them today and drive it on the street for a bit.
I ran 10.5" 46et rear which would effectively be a 11" 53et rear so that is about 20mm total compared to the 11" 63et CCW. On a 295 tires, 11" 53et should fit perfectly with -2 camber.
The 255/295 combo is really nice for DEs. The ghetto 275/295 setup we'll see if will work out for AX, in theory I expect it is faster. 9". Wanted a 9.5"/11.5" combo but some deals are hard to pass up.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
