25 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRejex Rocks!!!!!!!!
Leading reported evidence
Use (swirl removers contain abrasives) will remove the rejex
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Any abrasives used (swirl removers contain abrasives) will remove the Rejex.
Leading evidence: 'Use (swirl removers contain abrasives) will remove the rejex' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check label' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used a heavy wash with Dawn to clean away that crappy wax they used.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I used a heavy wash with Dawn to clean away that crappy wax they used.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Basically I am a moron when it comes to keeping cars clean which is why I went for it - the promise of not having to do much to it after one application just seemed too good to be true and so far seems valid.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Basically I am a moron when it comes to keeping cars clean which is why I went for it - the promise of not having to do much to it after one application just seemed too good to be true and so far seems valid.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
25 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
No not really, but AFTER you have given your car a coat of Rejex, and it has cured, then go over the car with some Meguires Swirl Remover 2.0, and you car will look marvelous.
I did mine about 3 months ago and the shine/beading is still holding up strong. I am assuming, however, that I will have to do it again some time soon so does anyone have any prep tips?
Basically I am a moron when it comes to keeping cars clean which is why I went for it - the promise of not having to do much to it after one application just seemed too good to be true and so far seems valid.
Barry
I agree Rejex is an excellent product, it holds up very well through everyday use, rain, etc... I also have a question, what is the best way to remove any residue when you want to reapply it?
I have had great results with almost all of my vehicles. One of them I didn't let cool down enough after washing it and it did not last that long - my fault. All of the others are holding up better than I expected. On the one that didn't last that long, it had all sorts of bug stains, etc. so I clay-bar'd it again before applying RejeX. Now the car gleams and beads like magic.
I just RejeX'd my wife's new MCS for the first time. That damn red already had some swirl marks and it's brand new! I spent some time polishing first. The dealer had their typical lame quickie detail job and the car didn't really shine at all. I used a heavy wash with Dawn to clean away that crappy wax they used. After applying RejeX, it glows like you can't believe.
I just rejexed my wife and she looks great. 20 years younger. I rejexed my boss yesterday and got a raise AND a bigger office. Next - Rejexing the Johnson. Look out Ron Jeremy!
Ok so you use dawn (or similar) to strip off the old wax.
Then 3m imperial hand glaze to remove swirl marks and polish the paint
Then apply rejex? Is it ok to apply the rejex without a second washing after the 3m hand glaze?
Don't know about the 3m. Some products contain silicones that will inhibit the adhesion of the rejex. Check the label? If you use polishes to get rid of swirls, make sure it is silicone free.
can rejex be applied with an orbital polisher or does it have to be applied by hand? if an orbital would work, would you just use a polishing pad? thanks!
One can use an orbital polisher to apply rejex, but it is so easy to apply by hand, using a polisher is overkill. If you do use a polisher, use a soft wax pad.
No not really, but AFTER you have given your car a coat of Rejex, and it has cured, then go over the car with some Meguires Swirl Remover 2.0, and you car will look marvelous.
I have applied Rejex with a PC buffer and by hand. I have noticed nothing different. You use more doing it the PC way but it is not that expensive
I also use a leaf blower to dry my cars and this stuff lets the water blow off with ease.
This kind of shine impresses everyone......
RejeX is still $16.09 and $2 for standard shipping.... it's the rennlist discount. be sure to use the new RejeX discount ordering page. it's fast and easy. here's the link....
http://www.x-autoproducts.com/pages/forumpurchase.htm
I couldn't disagree more. The Rejex is the LAST thing you do. Any polishing, swirl removing, stripping, etc... should be done first. Any abrasives used (swirl removers contain abrasives) will remove the Rejex. And again, make sure the products you use before Rejex do not contain any silicones as that will inhibit the adhesion of the Rejex.
Wash with Dawn
Clay bar car to remove impurities
perform any polishing or swirl remover required
If any of the polishing products contain silicones, rewash with Dawn to strip it
Apply Rejex with car cooled down in the shade and buff
Allow car to sit 12 hours out of sunlight to cure, rebuff if necessary
Ejoy!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
