fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Parts Listing linked with Pelican Parts.

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHParts Listing linked with Pelican Parts.

Leading reported evidence

Use pet

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Looks like they used the PET for the diagrams.

Original post Read captured discussion
Parts Listing linked with Pelican Parts.
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use pet' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use pet' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 12 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use pet

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Looks like they used the PET for the diagrams.

Original post Read captured discussion
Parts Listing linked with Pelican Parts.
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Check out the parts listing linked in with pelican Parts. This is realy great.... Chris http://www.pelicanparts.com/PartsLoo...SA_KATALOG.htm

POST 2 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

This is realy cool, you select the part number in the picture and then your number is shown on the lefts if available with price.

POST 4Original post

They did a good job with that. But the price database seems to be a little screwy in places: 911 logo (OEM-99655923711) for only $330.84!

POST 6Original post

that may be the right price... Ive seen the millenium edition "911" logo up to $250

POST 8Original post

That's correct, the chrome '911' logo is costly at $250+ at most places I've checked. Nuts, isn't it?

POST 9Original post

The silver logo (996-559-237-05-OEM) is only $194.75. That one apparently doesn't include the lube.

POST 11Original post

If you stutter you don't nneed the second "n".

POST 12Original post

That really IS awesome. Looks like they used the PET for the diagrams.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.