fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

OT- I did the Car and Driver Editor for a Day

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHOT- I did the Car and Driver Editor for a Day

Leading reported evidence

Test few vars

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

We basicly got to test a few vars and then write up our thoughts.

OT- I did the Car and Driver Editor for a Day
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test few vars' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test few vars' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test few vars

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

We basicly got to test a few vars and then write up our thoughts.

OT- I did the Car and Driver Editor for a Day
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I had the chance to take part in the Road and track and Car and Driver Editor for a Day event. It was held a Fed Ex Field. It was a really good event and not only did I enjoy it but I learned a few things. We basicly got to test a few vars and then write up our thoughts. We drove a BMW 530 XI, Cadillac STS, Cadillac SRX and a Lexus RX 350 (all with less than 200 miles on the odo). There were 2 autocross courses set up, 1 for the sedans and 1 for the SUVs. We had an instructor in the car but they pretty much let us have at it as hard as we wanted. Fed Ex is an awesome lot. The courses were simple but had a standing start to full acceleration, threshold breaking, sweepers, slalom, and a decreasing radius turn. Having autocrossed I understand understeer; however, one of the instructors/writers really helped me to realize how I can reduce the effects from easing up on the wheel�it made a huge difference for me. These are my thoughts on the cars: BMW 530XI- This was the car that probably had the biggest disappointment for me. I don�t care much for the new exterior styling; however, the interior was nice and roomy. I expected the BMW to be solid, which it was. The car had a solid brake feel as well. I did not like the auto tranny, it really held between gears making the shift feel awkward. All 3 of the vehicles experienced a relay problem that we were told would not affect the safety of the cars that it has to do with a sensor in the steering wheel. The light on the dash for AWD and DSC caution stayed on�seems strange for 3 new vehicles to have the same problem. I expected the BMW to be more of a fun car to drive, it was not, and the excitement was not there. Don�t get me wrong, the BMW performed better than the Cadillac STS, it just did not live up to my expectations. Cadillac STS- This car drove like I thought it would�like a big car. I was impressed by the acceleration. Braking was good but lacked a feel and drive involvement. The interior is very small compared to the BMW, something I did not expect. The interior was pretty cheap, especially on a $54K car. It has a smooth and quiet ride though. Lexus RX350- Felt like any other SUV. I think the styling is old and the interior is a love it or hate it�it�s not for me. Very quiet and comfortable. I got this thing going on the course and scared my passengers when the roll over light and chime went off, no problems though. Cadillac SVX- This car was the biggest surprise. A V6 model that had very good acceleration and awesome handling for this type of vehicle. Very smooth through the slalom and felt solid in every aspect. I really like this car, its heavy but that is what you would expect. Again, acceleration, braking, and handling of a sedan with the roominess and functionality of an SUV. Believe it or not this is the one I would have chosen to drive again.

POST 2Original post

Nice write-up. I've driven the SVX and had a similar appreciation for what cadillac has done with the crossover segment.

POST 3Original post

I have driven all the cars and can say you're pretty dead on about your write ups. The SRX drive pretty close to the STS, but carry around 800lbs more. They did a wonderful job at making it drive like a sedan. IMO its the best crossover on the market. I am also disappointed with the 530. They seem to have taken the Bimmer character out of the car. They are more sluggish feeling in the steering and gone toward that over amount of electrotech luxury in the suspension. With the horrible I drive and the lost of feel I would rather get a Benz.

POST 4Original post

BMW seems to have accomplished two things with their overly techno'd 5; they've screwed up the steering feel and they've made what would normally be a bullet-proof reliable part of the car ridiculously unreliable. And it's not only the steering. I've had six Bimmers (still have two), but their new cars are awful. If you check out the BMW message boards, you'll see them full of posts about faults in the steering system and other glitches. Come on BMW, just make a solid, reliable system without mucking it up with all the bogus systems designed to "help" the driver. This is just marketing driven crap.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.