12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFabspeed exhuast video
Leading reported evidence
Use fi
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use fi' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use fi' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Figured Id post a exhuast video I made today. Fabspeed headers and mufflers.
Enjoy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbQTUYBDspc
(like my license plate?)
Thanks,Yeah K/N....which was supposed to go into a chevy colorado pickup...but same diameter...and a bit larger than the black filthy mess that came with the evom intake. Its one of the generic ones that autozone carries.
Wow! Finally see another car with the exact same first generation CAI as mine!! I guess we both have the original version of the EVOMS intake. I love the sound at high revs.
Fabspeed headers and exhaust is a very nice combo especially with flash. The CAI makes the high RPM sound sweeter. I have the Gen I EVOMS intake also and think it gets a lot of warm air into the intake when not moving. Gen II solved that issue..
I've been toying with the idea of building a shroud over the exposed air filter so that all of the air it gets would have to be from the snorkel. Anyone ever try that?
Pete
my thinking was that on a stock intake, it is sealed and all air comes in via snorkel so the cai would do the same only over the larger filter and pipe that goes to the throttle body? Either that or fabricate a funnel that extends the area where the filter is upwards to seal against the decklid like the newer Evoms gen II.
May never get around to it but it swirls around my mind every once in a while!!
Pete
the mk1 already have varioram.... unless you use FI.... additional normal "ramming" will have no effect.... getting colder air is more important, to a point.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
