20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSecondary Air Pump Removal
Leading reported evidence
Check some other sources
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If no one confirms I will check some other sources.
Leading evidence: 'Check some other sources' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check some other sources' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Ditto in the UK, there is an annual test but is not as stringent as the 'smog'
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I know most Spec996 cars have it removed - and mine is headed that direction - so I don't really care about the CEL that will come on - I am removing cats anyway...
That said - I just don't know if you can disconect the hose and just cap it in lieu of completely removing it and getting a capping plate.
The problem with blocking the hose is that when (not if) other problems develop with the remains of the SAI system(vacuum leaks for example!) ,you will ignore the CEL.
Better to remove the entire system and get the ROW Flash so you never get an SAI code of any sort -and you do other tweaks to the ECU. Smog Test not an issue for your location ?
Particleweave is developing a cheaper hack circuit for this issue
http://986forum.com/forums/performan...ns-needed.html
My indy has a PWIS so the coding should be easy....
I just ordered the block off plates and the gaskets - seems like for $20 and the fact that this is a track car - it's a no-brainer.
Short update:
I removed the pump and simply blocked the hose. Since the CEL was already on due to my exhaust - nothing more happened.
The car starts and runs just fine. Longer term - I ordered the block off plates - but believe it or not - it looks like its going to be a metric pain in the *** to actually uninstall the hoses and get to the block off plates - as in - remove the alternator and all associated bits...
Either way - if you don't want it - feel free to remove and plug the hose... there are no (seeming) ill effects on the performance of the car except a CEL.
Ditto in the UK, there is an annual test but is not as stringent as the 'smog'
Early 996's in the UK did not have a secondary air pump from the factory.