fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Thoughts on this C4S

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
23 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHThoughts on this C4S

Leading reported evidence

Check these out

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Check these out.

Thoughts on this C4S
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check these out' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check these out' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 23 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Test drives

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Enjoy the test drives !!!

Thoughts on this C4S

Use rennlist

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Sent from my iPhone using Rennlist

Thoughts on this C4S
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check these out

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Check these out.

Thoughts on this C4S

Test drives

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Enjoy the test drives !!!

Thoughts on this C4S

Use rennlist

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Sent from my iPhone using Rennlist

Thoughts on this C4S
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

23 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T142254Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

He is negotiable. Obviously approaching a 996 Turbo price but if it can be brought down to $32K? Lots of options and is local. Does not have the IMS done. http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/4674936760.html

POST 2Original post

Nice high option car. Get a PPI before deciding on offer price. If everything checks out offer 30 and go from there. Factor in IMS replacement cost if you plan on having that done. Good luck.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks Street Rod. PPI for sure

POST 4Original post

Quotes source post: 11806023

Yes it would be a $30k offer take it or leave it. No need to haggle these model years should be hitting listings if they haven't already. $30k or very close to it pending PPI results.

POST 5Original post

Nice looking car, how many miles? Owners? Accidents? Sent from my iPhone using Rennlist

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks Kaution. Then there is the decision to do IMS or not..

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Not sure on owners. He has the maintenance records from I think 2002. He is a PCA member and not his first Porsche. 71k miles. Need to make sure on accidents - I think none

POST 8Original post

I'm not sure I could live with those seats on a daily basis. They could always be changed out again though. At his asking price, he is wanting to recoup some of his modification $, but that rarely happens in real life sales transactions. OTOH, you could not duplicate it for $30K-$32K, so if it has what you want, see if you can make a deal.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for the replies. I also found this one that is local. Gonna try and see it today. I was wondering about those seats and the comfort level but the other upgrades look nice http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/4745581647.html

POST 10Original post

They both look like good possibilities for you. The SY is a model year newer and has less miles. Condition inside and out, options and especially paper work for any repairs etc. is so important. Have you had a chance to drive the Porsches? GL with your search.

POST 12Original post

Hans at RAC in Addison can get you a good PPI on whichever one you decide on. That silver looks delicious.

POST 13 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks Mark. I have heard he is the man

POST 14 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 11807373

Is it bc of the upgrades and yellow can be a little too flashy?

POST 15Original post

The mods/upgrades on the SILVER are the main reasons. And yes, the yellow is not just a LITTLE but way to flashy for me. But if yellow works for YOU, then go for it (plus it is priced less and mileage is also lower).

POST 16Original post

Her is the build sheet for teh yellow on http://admin.porschedealer.com/repor...AA29943s623676

POST 17Original post

The rear retractable spoiler on the silver one appears to be broken as it is extended in all of the pics, even when parked. Or, maybe he just is a MkI Aero wannabe!!

POST 18Original post

Here's a vote for the yellow one. Its hard to tell how nice it is from the limited pics, but if it checks out, and if you like the bright color, go for it. Cars in unusual colors are significantly more rare than those in common hues such as black and silver, etc. This is good or bad depending on your point of view. Might be harder to resell, but when the right buyer appears it might command a higher price for those who want a color. I personally will not consider black or silver, but most other COLORS are options for me.

POST 20Original post

I prefer the yellow but the silver one has the hard core options, if those appeal. One deciding factor for me might be if one has more solar damage. Dallas is famous for solar damage to the headlights, paint, rubber, and interior. If one was parked in a sunny lot at work every day and the other garaged most of the time, it should show by now with very careful inspection. I'd want the one that's still fresh, with no solar damage.

POST 21Original post

Silver one is way over priced, yellow one is very nice, and slightly high, al in my opinion of course. Enjoy the test drives !!!

POST 22 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for the replies. I agree the silver is overpriced but if I could get it at $30k with all the mods might be worth it. However, I am not sure about the rollbar, seats, etc. I will have to see it in person soon. I did find out the yellow one had a minor fender bender that was not on carfax - the seller told me over the phone. It happened before he bought it. Not sure how I feel about buying one that has been in any accident. I will take a look regardless.

POST 23 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Check these out. Wow. Wish it was local https://www.pca.org/classified-ad/304522 https://www.pca.org/classified-ad/304517

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.