14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAlmost matching rims, Ooops!
Leading reported evidence
Run back and forth
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The fact that they're on opposite sides of the car means you can't really tell unless you run back and forth from side to side...
Leading evidence: 'Run back and forth' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run back and forth' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I�ve posted before about the difficulty finding 10x18 et47 winter rear rims for my 03 4s. Last winter I incorrectly stretched 265/35 winter tires on stock 11x18 et45 rear rims and i was determined not to do that this winter. I finally found a used aftermarket turbo twist on ebay, bought it, and had it sent out to be refurbished. While it was being repaired i bought a second, new, aftermarket turbo twist rim and had it shipped from Italy. When it finally arrived i had my winter tires mounted and started driving.
About a week later i happened to notice that although both rears are turbo twist 10x18 et47 rims, they look slightly different as shown in the photos below:
....and no comments please about the center caps not pointed at the valve stem!
Thats the jwl stamp. Its "japanese wheel light" i think. All aluminium rims have it, not sure why.
If they r factory rims the part # should be on the inside of the spoke
Neither has the 996.362.140.02 part number, i knew they weren�t factory rims. Factory would also have 10 and 47 on either side of the valve stem I believe.
If one happens to be hollow, would that impact how the car handles or feels? I�ve put at least 500 miles on these rims and don�t feel anything unusual.
If they r not factory i highly doubt one is a hollow. U could just weigh them even with the tire on there should be a couple pound difference. I doubt u would notice an issue if one was a hollow, it would just be less unsprung weight.
May just be the difference between how 2 different companies copied the wheel.
It's easy to tell whether it is hollow since I am selling on CL a hollow spoke set and a solid spoke set. The solid spoke has the ribs on the back side of spoke and the hollow spoke is smooth on back side of spoke....hollow spoke is also about 3x as expensive for like condition wheels. If you are local to me, go to Seattle CL if interested in my sets.
Thanks for that info, based on photo from the eBay listing shown below its not hollow:
I dont have a photo of the inside of the new rim but based on its price i highly doubt it is hollow either. I think i agree, different manufacturers just produced different looking aftermarket rims. Maybe 993 turbo twists had that look??
So i just went out a took a picture of my OEM wheels..here is what the hollow spoke and solid spoke look side by side....(hollow spoke has tires mounted)
The hollow spoke is not as rounded on the rim and just has step down to the spokes. Never noticed before.
The solid spoke seems more rounded and has the relief ring to emulate that of hollow spoke...again never noticed before....that is really the only minor difference i could see.
Frankly as **** as i am, the fact that I didn't notice until you brought it up says if i were you I wouldn't worry about it.😊
I believe you will find the "993" part number on the twist with the "ring" on it and a "996' part number on the one without. Both being the same solid wheels and Factory available on early 996 , the ring and the part number are the only difference..
Just looked at photos from a 1996 993 4s currently for sale on BaT with 18" turbo twists and yahtzee!, @Porschetech3 appears correct.
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19...carrera-4s-45/
if the fronts are the same as the backs I wouldn't worry too much (if they're only winter wheels). The fact that they're on opposite sides of the car means you can't really tell unless you run back and forth from side to side... You can always stay on the alert for matching ones and then sell the odd ones after...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.