16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHLooks Like the 996TT Forum will soon be our bitches
Leading reported evidence
Use term "stable"
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
as well as 8 other cars (counting cars driven by 2 teenage sons), I still don't qualify to use the term "stable".
Looks Like the 996TT Forum will soon be our bitches
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use term "stable"' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use term "stable"' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Looks Like the 996TT Forum will soon be our bitches
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Well, today Internet Brands moved the 997TT forum to under the 997NA forum, making it a sub-forum. If they did that to the 997TT guys, can the 996TT forum be far behind?
I am thinking about starting out all of my posts with "Now that I own a 996TT . . ." What do you guys think?
Or would it be easier for you all to just, you know, keep that phrase ("kcattorney now owns a 996TT") in the forefront of your minds whenever you are on Rennlist (even in a thread where I am not participating). Because, you know, I do own a 996TT.
Does anybody know if Rolex makes a watch shaped like a 996, err I mean 996
TT
?
^ Good one. Only one problem: I believe the standard for having a "stable" is total fair market value of cars of at least $100k.
Even though I do now own a 996TT
as well as 8 other cars (counting cars driven by 2 teenage sons), I still don't qualify to use the term "stable".
Most of my other cars are crap (remember that I still own a 928, plus a Sterling kit car).
I think my sons' cars are actually valued at a negative number, if that's possible.
The move has resulted in considerable consternation among the 997 TT group.
Why move the 997 TT group, but none of the others? It seems like a mistake to me.
I'm sure the 996 TT guys will be headed your way shortly!
