15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDyno Update
Leading reported evidence
Replace cats/headers/muffler/filter/ron between the original and recent dyno runs
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Jeneric, I wont know the answer to that until I dyno again with the stock header in place because I changed cats/headers/muffler/filter/RON between the original and recent dyno runs.
Leading evidence: 'Replace cats/headers/muffler/filter/ron between the original and recent dyno runs' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace cats/headers/muffler/filter/ron between the original and recent dyno runs' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
In short the current setup is running a satisfactory AFR above 4500Rpm.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
That seems to make the case for running with good fuel (if you can get it).
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace cats/headers/muffler/filter/ron between the original and recent dyno runs
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Jeneric, I wont know the answer to that until I dyno again with the stock header in place because I changed cats/headers/muffler/filter/RON between the original and recent dyno runs.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I took the car back to the dyno today to see how things were shaping up with the exhaust and intake changes.
The details and comparative before/after dyno chart is here
http://www.oz951.com/public/emmy.htm#2nd_dyno
.
Looks like some worthwhile improvements across the board so far.
Nice pages
I have a set of the ebay headers allso. Allmost the same as yours, and same desing flaw on mine too.
The inlet hole on the flange is way too big for stock head, this will result turbulence in the gas flow and increase the back pressure. IMO
I was planning to weld the holes smaller and port mach those to the head.
Try buying a nut splitter for the future. It just splits the nuts in half then you tap the bolt out of the hole.
I'm not sure of the comparison in octanes but all they sell over here is 92 style of american octane with alcohol mixed in. Really does suck being forced into reduced mileage and performance besides extra wear on the engine. Track was even shut down so the one station that sold race fuel doesn't anymore.
I'm more and more convinced if it's going for the best deal of dollars to hp the nitrous route would be the least cost per hp. Or in realistic terms "THE BEST BANG FOR THE BUCK" especially if you blow the engine up
Here's just and idea of the nut splitters.
http://www.amazon.com/Nut-Splitter-T.../dp/B0000AX88Q
http://hand-tools.hardwarestore.com/...r--648288.aspx
Nice site you made there. Wishing you all the best of times enjoying the wonderful automobile.
Good question Jr., I have updated the web page with a graph showing the AFR for the stock and latest runs. I didn't bother with a comparative print out for the AFR with the fabspeed CAI since I have gotten rid of it but there is enough information between the old and new charts to see how they compare.
In short the current setup is running a satisfactory AFR above 4500Rpm. I haven't downloaded the ignition data yet but I imagine there is room for some ECU tuning of both AFR & timing if i can find someone to do a bespoke tune for my car on the dyno.
Bear in mind the AFRs measured are post cat.
To Barn996, Pac996, Speed, Bkj & R1de - cheers, glad you like the pages.
I have updated the dyno section of the page with ignition timing data extracted during one of the dyno runs.
It definitely breathes differently with the K&N filter and exhaust setup - The AFR is a fair bit leaner than stock. That seems to make the case for running with good fuel (if you can get it).
I'll have to get some data on the road with this setup and then switch the fuel to 99 (from 97) and see if I can get some more spark advance under load.
http://www.oz951.com/public/emmy.htm#2nd_dyno
Jeneric, I wont know the answer to that until I dyno again with the stock header in place because I changed cats/headers/muffler/filter/RON between the original and recent dyno runs.
Mark, true - I like how OCD is called "passion" when it's about Porsches.
