16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHQuestion for all those MAF sensor experts!!
Leading reported evidence
Clean mass air flow sensor
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
First time I cleaned the MAF sensor with some electronics cleaner and a qtip.
I had the same codes, cleaned the MAF with MAF cleaner (I doubt there is any difference from what you used, but there might be) and have not had a CEL since.
Leading evidence: 'Clean mass air flow sensor' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check connection' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I had same codes, cleaned the MAF a few times and reset the codes.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I just did mine, and dropped the engine and replaced lifters at the same time.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Dealer replaced MAF under CPO warranty and everthing is fine.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
I had the same codes, cleaned the MAF with MAF cleaner (I doubt there is any difference from what you used, but there might be) and have not had a CEL since.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
MY 01 Cab has been getting check engine lights for the last couple months. Three total times, each time happened while I was stationary (or close to it) and just idling. Same codes each time...
Motronic 7.2
Current Fault Codes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P1130
Porsche fault code 361 - Oxygen sensing adaptation
idle range bank 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P1128
Porsche fault code 360 - Oxygen sensing adaptation
idle range bank 1
First time I cleaned the MAF sensor with some electronics cleaner and a qtip. Second time I just cleared the codes with the durametric. And then tonite I was in stop and go traffic on the highway and the light came on again.
I think this means I need to get a new MAF sensor, but before I do that, wanted to see if anyone else has any other ideas or if it could potentially be O2 sensors???
THanks in advance.....
I had same codes, cleaned the MAF a few times and reset the codes. In stop and go traffic, the codes would pop back on every few days. Once it started to cool down, with a cold engine, it started to hesitate and backfire. I quickly changed out MAF and everything has been fine for 9 months now.
Rick
99 996C4
87 944S
P1128 Oxygen Sensing Adaptation, Idle Range, Bank 1 – Above Limit
P1130 Oxygen Sensing Adaptation, Idle Range, Bank 2 – Above Limit
Potential causes:
– Incorrect signal from MAF sensor
– Intake air system leaking
– Fuel pressure too low
– Volume supply of fuel pump too low
– Fuel injectors fouled
– Exhaust system leaking
It is not your O2 sensors.
You need to measure the air flow over the MAF at idle and at idle and no load (AC off) 3000 RPM.
The MAF should read:
idle - 12 - 24 ML in kg/h
3000 RPM - 50 - 80 ML in kg/h
If it is not within these limits then the MAF is likely bad.
If it is within those limits then you likely have an air leak in the intake, or a broken bellow on the AOS.
I had the same codes, cleaned the MAF with MAF cleaner (I doubt there is any difference from what you used, but there might be) and have not had a CEL since.
Loren - Is the airflow measurement something that I can do from the Durametric software? I seem to remember something that you can measure for the MAF but not sure if its the same thing that you mentioned in your post. Would be cool if I could easily measure it to know if the MAF is bad!
Thanks
First,I don't think you should have used a q-tip. those wires are very delicate
I had to clean my MAF several times before I got it to stop sending codes.
The last time I cleaned it I drowned every orifice that piece of plastic had.
That did it no more codes since then.
I used electronic cleaner.
Loren - I did the measurements tonite with the Durametric. I was within the limits at idle and at 3000RPM. At idle I was ~23.4 kg/h and at 3000K was ~64.2 kg/h. Let the car run for about 15 minutes and the check engine light didn't go back on.
I'm at the high range of the limits you had documented...could it still be the MAF??? I have an EVO intake and checked the connection for air leaks and there was none that I could feel/see. What is the AOS?? (you mentioned broken bellows?)
Thanks in advance Will
AOS is the Air Oil Separator. Located at the left front of the engine, on the top. A major pain to get at when the engine is in the car. I think the shop time is 10-12 hours as you have to remove most of the intake/manifolds, etc. It is almsot easier and quicker to drop the engine to replace the AOS. I just did mine, and dropped the engine and replaced lifters at the same time.
Most forums you go to you have a thousand amateurs diagnosing your car issues. This forum we have a thousand amateurs and Loren, who knows everything ever.
I feel like Rennlist owes Loren a gift. What a guy to have around.
Thanks to the discussion thread about P1128 and P1130. After sifting through the possibilities, I decided to swap to a new MAF sensor. Glad I bought it from Pelican instead of Porsche. Saved about $400. Thanks again for the forum input.
I've got a neat article on the confusing Mass Air Flow sensor problems and what replacement you need right here:
http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarti...low_Sensor.htm
Hope this helps someone...
-Wayne
Funny you should ask. I have it torn apart in my garage, and then I had the termite guys come today to work in the garage. So, I had to drop it down, pull out the lift, and then tow it out of the garage using the tow hook. It was pretty difficult to do that.
Here's the progress on the suspension:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...-part-2-a.html
-Wayne
Real nice car there Wayne. I'm sure there is going to be a lot of enjoyment out of it on the road.
C4CRNA mentioned "I don't think you should have used a q-tip"
I'll just say never do it. The surface reads parts per million and even cotton can foul the metal coating up. It's a super thin coating of metal. Be it a rebreather or MAF O2 sensor its a very sensitive part. Only flood and flush. Good thing you picked up another because if you scrubbed on the plate with a q-tip I'd concider its reading for use always questionable.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.