99 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHonda K Swap 996. Now You Can Have One Too!
Leading reported evidence
Replace 996 it was time
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Its been a while since I posted but I wanted to let you guys know after 10 months of daily driving my 550hp K swapped 996 it was time to let others in on the action.
Leading evidence: 'Replace 996 it was time' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'smartest thing you have ever said, ever' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check $14k and send my roller' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I think we will see 1000hp Tesla swapped 996 Track Monsters soon...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Second, I�ve never heard a LS swapped 996/997 owner complain about handling.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I even changed computer code to get the timing curve or fuel curve correct on Electronic FI and it was still called "tuning"...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
It�s the Honda K24 4 cylinder motor swapped into the 996 chassis.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Its been a while since I posted but I wanted to let you guys know after 10 months of daily driving my 550hp K swapped 996 it was time to let others in on the action.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
99 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T074343Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Its been a while since I posted but I wanted to let you guys know after 10 months of daily driving my 550hp K swapped 996 it was time to let others in on the action. The car is nuts. Makes 300 wheel horsepower over a bolt on M96 and weighs 75lbs less behind the rear axle. I just released a motor mount kit that allows you to bolt in the Honda K24 into the 996 and 997 chassis. Feel free to check out the bayside fabrication website for more information. I also have almost all the parts to swap my rainforest green 996 as well so stayed tuned for that project! Happy to share any info or answer any questions you have here.
I didn't closely follow your original build posts and I have a question. Was it necessary to run the exhaust outlets out above the rear bumper cover due to other stuff in the way below or on the lower sides? Just wondering.
No not at all. When I started it I wanted a certain �look� to it. Mostly that scratching your head wondering what the hell�s going on with this car look. I�m swapping my green 996 within the next couple months and that�s going to have a air to water intercooler and normally routed exhaust.
This requires the Skunk2 low profile magnesium valve cover to clear. I have not personally fitted it in a 997 but since they are the same chassis in that area it�s a yes.
IIRR " burning corn " is maybe a hot hatch term used for E 85
And they got it right, mostly E85 works as good or better than race fuel for big boost engines at a much cheaper price.
Thanks, I thought so but hadn't heard that expression..
I love Methanol in race cars ( but it has it's cons), but I don't care for E85 since all the E85 we have around here is crap. It is the lowest grade gasoline with Ethanol added to boost up the octane to 91, so around here you have to order/buy VP E85 in the can to get quality stuff..( or mix it yourself)
I don�t know about �hot hatch term� all my ls and coyote turbo friends say that too but you are correct I run e85. There�s a couple local e85 stations within 10 minutes of me. It burns about 33% more fuel but it�s equivalent to 105 octane. It�s phenomenal for boosted cars.
E85 is allowed by law to be like +\- 20% ethanol content which is nuts. We usually see in the high 70% range which is why a flex fuel sensor is handy. Ignite race field is our go to down here and it�s guaranteed e90. So the guys riding the limits and need that content to be exact usually go for that.
Hot Hatch example:
Methanol: Used it in my 150cc two stroke open dirt kart and my 360 Sprint car. Yep it is tricky and requires certain maintenance procedures that aren't normal. Wouldn't want to use it in a street car!
I don't even know what that means anymore...lol
I was a "tune up man" for FoMoCo for 3 decades back in the 70's 80's 90's before they started calling it "Drivability Specialist"..
I did the recurves on the Distributor Dyno Machine for acouple of NASCAR teams ( The Alabama Gang) jetting the carbs, troubleshooting ect..
Back then a "tune up" was setting everything to factory specs or changing timing and fuel curve for more performance ( or to fix problems caused by changing cams,CR, intakes, exhausts, ect)
I even changed computer code to get the timing curve or fuel curve correct on Electronic FI and it was still called "tuning"...
But nowadays I think a "tuned car" can mean anything from wheels/tires, paint, suspension, custom body work to engine mods...
yeah you might be a couple decades behind. I have a haltech ecu. I can literally �tune� the car however I want. Ignition, fuel injectors, vtec, cam phasing, turning on/off ac compressor, staging fuel pumps, anti lag, traction Control, boost by gear, boost by speed, etc etc etc. literally I can control every aspect of the engine based on what components are on it and how it responds when under load.
yea,I have heard the aftermarket ECU's were very easy compared to the factory stuff.. They are more, how you say " user friendly"...
The hard part on the factory stuff is getting the file for all the tables/maps...or .xdf files..The Factory doesn't want to give it up, and the Hackers, don't want to give it away, they want to sell it..
And of course above all, you need to know what you are doing and why you are doing it..
After reading the forums over the years, it seems that the general pool of Porsche owners are very apprehensive about the actual real-world costs and any potential setbacks in handling and performance aside from the HP jump. While there is a sizable LS swap following for Porsche 996/997 cars, it seems that many of them dump almost as much in the engine, electronics, and Renegade hybrid type kits as they would a decent M96 rebuild. Then, they complain about the handling, apparently from the higher center of gravity from the V8 architecture which of course is not the same as the horizontally opposed engines. Even some find themselves in danger territory from oil sarvation issues on the track from an engine that wasn't designed to be operated in a rear-engine configuration.
There is also concern about the resale of one of these cars. Judging from the middle finger comments on their forums, the LS crowd don't really give a rats azz what the next owner thinks or experiences...they're into the "now". Many Porsche 996 owners that don't have the money to rebuild their M96 correctly, also don't have the money to fix a major problems or consequences with these kits either. Quite a conundrum. The extreme case was WhiteOut's LS swap 996 here on RL where the next owner lost control of the car and killed himself or even Hoovie that spent a butt-load of money making the Apollo 996 work only to have it die on the track. Maybe these cases are actually just a few and these kits do make it fun for many people to get to experience these cars. Time will tell.
First off this isn�t a LS. This weighs 75lbs less and is a completely different power plant and after selling the stock motor and exhaust I�m into it for under $5k. Second, I�ve never heard a LS swapped 996/997 owner complain about handling. The center of gravity comment gets me every time as well. Very funny. Third, the m96 is the biggest piece of junk motor I have ever delt with and the second I can pull one and get it out of my life the better.
What is the total cost to make this Honda K swap happen?
Also, not sure why you think center of gravity concerns are funny. I find it a compelling argument. It's physics 101 -
Lower CG is better from a handling standpoint. Lower CG reduces weight transfer during cornering and braking. It also reduces the car's potential for roll over.
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/375x197/3fb8ccb1_8f03_458e_bb18_ea8e5e5343ed_86aeed6bafe62ccc84370b1802bfaf86026eb750.gif
I am $14,176 total into the swap but sold the stock motor with a fab speed exhaust for $10,650. So all in $3,526. Its just funny that your claiming the LS cars are dangerous and your going to crash because 40lbs might be 4" higher than before. Anyways, mines not a LS. The stock M96 weighs 496lbs, mine in full turbo form, added fuel system , air conditioning etc weighs 416lbs. Thats 80lbs removed behind the rear axle. I will take that plus 300 more hp any day. Even if the weight is a little "higher" theres was less of it.
Not to perpetuate the off topic LS talk…but I’m going to. That CoG argument is an interesting one (I think it’s bull ****). But, it doesn’t matter what I think because soon we will have data from my car that will show just what difference exists. Same tires/suspension/ very close weight. If the handling is degraded from the LS, we will see it in actual data.
To try to get back OT, I’m pretty excited there is now a kit for the K swap on the market. A very cool way to make a lowly 996 into something that can terrorize turbos on the highway.
Yes, I know that. I've been following your build since you started it two years ago and the LS swaps were brought up as a more established standard. LS is also the most common swap for our cars and the K24 is like the 4 cylinder equalivant to the LS in the tuner world.
In my previous comment, I don't think I ever claimed that LS swapped Porsches were "dangerous" other than mentioning the WhiteOut accident. Any car pushed to the limit on the street or track can be dangerous. I've been following the Porsches forums for more than 8 years and my opinions are emperical in nature.
I'm definitely looking forward to the data that you can produce in a real-world track situation. This will definitely put the LS swap baby to rest.
Differences of opinions aside, I do wish you the best and safe track experience.
Center of Gravity is a static measurement...It is not much more difficult/time consuming than measuring corner balance...
I'm amazed no one who does these swaps has done it..
BTW :: using Track Data/ET to access Center of Gravity is stupid...
The negative affect of higher CoG is the car handles worse.
Using G data to see the cornering force comparison to the setup with the stock engine should provide a real world picture of the validity of that hypothesis because I have not changed anything else that will affect the handling.
How is that stupid ?
Well, couldn't agree more...
Just look at the 996 HP thread,,, after a $20-70K big bore sleeved nik'd rebuild (thats the only way to fix a m96 half correctly) lucky to get 70 more hp on the 'bigge$t ($70k) build$, and 20-30hp on the regular engine builder $29,500 big bores.
Thats $1000 per HP.
Look at the numbers on the dyno sheets in the HP thread, majority of big bore sleeved nik'd rebuilds are 310-335 whp. And you're still left with a very expensive engine/parts. To diy build a m96 engine correctly better set aside $$$$ for special one off tools to go along with your 20k+ worth of parts/machining and thats if you have a perfect core to start with that doesn't need a $6000 crank, or engine cases, or head work, or $1500x2 chain/cam timing components, etc.
M96 builds need Expensive specialty tools and juggling acts to get in piston pins correctly. Couldn't believe it when I saw a hole in the cyl walls to facilitate piston pin install, ridiculous imo. I'm sure most mechanically minded experienced engine builders will admit the m96 engine is of poor design/structure with bean counters weighing in heavily on its design compromise. Don't need to list all the problems and defective structure, we all know them all to well here... From the imsb to the AOS to the loco-sil, to the wet sump, its all very painful to see this period in financially strapped Porsche engine history.
To me, a M E for many many decades, with hundreds of different types of engine builds, a few with podium finishes.... to build a m96 engine for 20-30k+ makes no sense financially or tune/hp wise.
I can understand it is the Porsche purist way, but other than that... you're way upside down,, with most $ale $ites not even acknowledging the great high dollar rebuild that just went into a 996. For the average sale, lucky to get another $5k in sale price, maybe,, for over 20k spent. Ya, there are exceptions to this if the right buyer is found, but its not the norm.
All that being said, I am in the market for a rewarding 996 project track car. Need a nice roller for a great price to make it worth while for me. 996 cars handle so nice it intrigues me to be able to pump out 500+hp like a modern super car for the same or
probably less money
than a minimum m96 rebuild. Imo, the great chassis handling, comfort, and style of the 996 cars makes a swap with big hp a very attractive project...
The K 24 swap above seems very crude and ruff around the edges for a Porsche imo. Maybe the next one will be more refined, idk. Nothing personal, but To be honest, the exhaust exits seem very fart can ricer to me. But kudos for even trying this and coming out with a flame thrower 500hp beast. Must have been a ton of fab work. Do all gauges/functions work on this swap..? looking forward to seeing your next more refined swap.
The Audi 2.7single turbo swap use a $1000 boneyard readily available factory turbo V6 that integrates completely & perfectly with the 996 ecu since it use the same ecu. All gauges/functions work like they did with the m96 engine. Also might be nice to have a timing belt for a change. They say total swap cost is less than $15k with kit parts. If it blows, another one is readily available for cheap. And could always rebuild it to know what ya got before you install it. Have never done the 2.7tt rebuild but am told its a basic rebuild, nothing super special or real expensive needed as its already set up for a turbo.
Then there is the LS swap we've all heard so much about. Some have said it makes an incredible 996 car. Some have had less than perfect swaps. But a totally integrated LS swap can be done some have said. IDK as I've never done 1, but might be a great project with very rewarding results if done right.... Seems close to 450-500rwh with more torque than a 996 can probably handle without extensive chassis work is reality for many LS swaps, with more HP/TQ on the table if ya want.
Some say even a Troll can build a LS swap to 470whp, not sure about that, think it takes a truly talented person to do that swap nicely...
JMHO
I don't care for 996 engine swaps either, but let's be honest here. Engine swaps have been going on ever since the car culture evolved to the point where people wanted more hp/torq, reliability or the look at me syndrome. Look under the hoods of some of the street rods you see. God knows what is going to be in there! I love my 996 but, honestly, if someone wants to drop in a (fill in the blank) engine that is their choice. The 996 is a great car in spite of what some opinions are here but it is not a sacred cow.
Coming to a Porsche forum and constantly repeating the "
Third, the m96 is the biggest piece of junk motor I have ever delt
(sic)
with and the second I can pull one and get it out of my life the better."
comment is not going to be popular nor win many supporters. It would be the same if I went to a Honda forum and said the K20 or K24 was a boat anchor. I have a Honda with only a lowly turbo K20 in it but I have fun with it. Do I want a K20 or K24 in my 996...NOPE!
To each their own.
Drive on in good health.
I�m not trying to win over anyone. Facts hurt. Especially when you get financially and emotionally invested into a brand. Saying what I said might sting to those who are in the above group and that�s ok. Deep down the guy who spent $25k on a rebuild for a car he can sell for $27k knows the truth whether he wants to admit it or not . I believe the 996/997 chassis is one of the best ever that the average joe can still buy but the power plant just didn�t make it what it could be. 🍻🍻🍻
I love the idea of a cheap Honda engine swap. But I do have a question. Where are people storing the 3 other Honda engines they will need to buy for when they blow in succession like yours did?.
Fair, but you have to admit, he's not wrong. I don't know how anyone in here can defend the M96.0 as a decent motor. Mediocre performance, many catastrophic failure modes and it isn't even cheap.
edit: None of these swaps have any appeal to me besides the 9A1 (not really relevant to this thread either), but I do appreciate people doing them. If that's what it takes to keep a car on the road for someone, that's great.
Well you certainly accomplished your first sentence above.
I can't speak for everyone but I don't buy a car to make money or even break even when I sell it. I buy a car because I want to drive and enjoy it. If it is worth zero when I'm done so be it.
As far as the M96, the truth hurts...but I normally plug my ears.
I hope that I can make the one in my '99 last. Maybe by the time it does let go - if it ever does - they'll be several swap options that have been proven; thanks to the pioneers that take the risk and bear the expense.
Because Center of Gravity is a "Static" measurement, using a "DYNAMIC" environment to assess without first establishing the "Static" value is stupid.....
******** comment but I�ll bite. Pushing a used stock internal motor past its mechanical capabilities will yield certain results. With that being said my cars been living a year driven 3x times a week at 550hp since I put in the forged bottom end.
Facts point to the truth and the truth is, you are trying to win people over because you're in the business to make money just like Renegade Hybrids. Own it Ben!
https://www.baysidefabrication.com/new-page-3
The reason one would care about the static value is because of a desire to project its effect on dynamic performance.
The dynamic performance is what we experience when we use the car, those results are the only ones I see value in.
This is a Porsche 996 forum, once you do an engine swap, its not a 996 any longer.
If your intent is to sell swap kits I believe you need to become site sponsor.
Perhaps the Mods could create a Frankenstein, or Orphan sub forum for these discussions.
Right, same as with the total weight of a car...
Personally I wouldn't do anything to increase the values of either.....but if I did , I would want to know by "how much"...statically first, dynamically second....doing otherwise is stupid..
I didn�t advertise anything. I�m just saying there is now another great option. Don�t be a Karen and try to squash a one man business which keeps keeps these chassis chugging along.
Sure, you can know the statistical value but YOU have no way to understand what, if any impact that value will have. Therefore, the value is meaningless without the context of how it impacts performance.
So, we can be efficient and skip caring about stuff that doesn�t matter and go straight to understanding the performance delta, using data.
nice work! ignore the bitter olds, this place is mostly a retirement community full of bitter dudes sleeping on the couch. Has it been put on any other cars? Would like to see one in person.
The swap kit option is pretty cool and glad the build isn�t going to be a �one off�.
Just don�t get the constant bickering about swaps. Who cares? It�s nice to appreciate collector cars and weirdo cars.
Ok so now we are at the hanging out at the pub stage,,, soooooo
) I own a tesla and a 996,, Oh and a little Gm Spark EV that causes folks heads to explode light to light..
My LS swapped jeep is sub 4 seconds 0 to 60 do I get a Cookie?
Only thing I will say is I am one of the guys that just paid the freight for the rebuild.
I have done enough bad decision making in my life on swaps that at this point,,
I don't find anything particularly wrong with the K swap..
I prefer N/A motors just cause I hate buying fuel and tires for track toys.
The one that I look at a lot is a new Gen 5 4.3 gm v6..
That little bugger has potential if Holley would release a v6 version of their DFI terminator setup.
A 300+HP V6 crate motor that would drop in a boxter chassis easy could be a hoot. Especially since they are light..
Put the Holley glass dash in the center dash and call it a day..
Hmmmm, this is an interesting thread touching on lots of topics (good and bad IMO) but I guess I like the idea of having an affordable option for my car...... if I were to blow the engine.
First of all, I do not have $20k for a rebuild and do not anticipate saving for it. I got into my 911 for under $10k at the lowest pricepoint, put a few thousand into it and have a wonderful car I love and have fulfilled my childhood dream of owning a 911. My car is not 'stock' and never will be 'stock' as long as I own it. If the engine were to launch, then I would have a beautiful piece of yard art or entertain an economical engine swap so I appreciate what you have done and thanks for sharing with me.
Thank you for the comment. These cars are abundant and still the cheapest 911 you can get into. Your position is like many. It�s a real hard pill to swallow throwing $20k into a car you can only sell for $25k. And that $20k just gets you back to stock�.and who wants to do that!
Innovation is frowned on here, what's odd is that's a selective postition. Made by vendors selling their own bolt on solutions or core swaps propped up by renlist consumers.
I'm gonna buy yours when mine goes. However, the math says it likely won't happen for a long time despite what others say. Solid work, looking forward to seeing the next iteration. Keep posting.
I would certainly advocate people swap a different motor in than give a vendor here $30-40k for a 4.0 build that barely cracks 300whp.
Probably good to cut back on the name calling though.
I think you will find that most 996 Forum members, myself included, find any swap of interest regardless of whether they would do it or not for their own car.
Today we have many different versions of engine swaps for the 996 including: Honda, Chevy, Audi, Tesla, 9A1, GT3 and Cup engines. Bet more are on the way. I applaud it just as much as I applaud innovation in M96 engine rebuilds. More options the better.
What incites a riot on RL is when you call someones baby ugly (see attached above). I have followed Bayside on his original RL thread as well as his YouTube channel. Seems to be a pretty likeable guy and a talented fabricator. His marketing approach follows the philosophy of stirring the pot to get a response to create awareness on his product. Which is why I had a little fun with him in my response to his comments on the M96 regarding his 3 Honda engine failures back to back and where to store the extra 3 Honda engines needed to keep the car running. No engine is bulletproof, and most engines in stock form can't handle the extreme rigors of the track or in some cases the street without modifications. Especially if you reverse the direction of the engine to work in a 911.
In reality, none of the rebuilds or swaps are inexpensive. Some may cost less for parts than others but as with everything else in life, there is a tradeoff. If you are a skilled DIY guy, everything is cheaper from a monetary outlay standpoint, but very expensive from a personal time standpoint. For the non-DIY guy, there is no personal time cost, but a huge monetary cost based on shop hours regardless if you get a M96 rebuild or do a Honda, Audi, Tesla, 9A1 or Mezger swap.
So nobody should kid themselves. Whatever option you choose, you are still looking at a big monetary cost or big personal time cost or both. Comes down to what your end goal is and how you will get there.
Agree with all that suggest Rennlist should create a SWAP forum.
Naw, people usually come here for answers to FAP - "frequently asked problems".
Like...
1. Any idea how to get my radio code?
2. Cupholder options?
3. Where do I put my iPhone?
4. Is it okay to park a Porsche on an inclined parking spot?
5. Should I cover my snorkel when washing the car?
6. Can I take my Porsche to one of those automatic car wash places?
7. How should I point my Porsche center wheel caps?
8. Does anyone know how to decode an option sticker?
9. '99 996 owners - Where is my glove compartment?
10. I'm locked out of my frunk and can't start the car. What are my options?
11. I hear a beeping sound when I get past 65 mph. How do I turn it off?
12. My temps are above 180F, almost touching 185F, should I be concerned?
13. I'm leaking pink fluid on the driver side tailpipe, what is that?
14. My windows won't go down when I open the door, how can this be corrected?
15. What type of tires do you run?
16. What is the best leather conditioner for these seats?
17. Just took my seats out to clean, now I have a AIRBAG warning light. How do I reset?
18. Does anyone really think a normal human being can fit in the back seat?
19. Is it bad when the coolant looks like diarrhea and coolant light is flashing?
20. My car's display says, "Drive to Workshop", but I'm not aware of any Porsche workshops happening this year. Maybe it's thinking about the PCA Porsche parade or something? Gosh, these cars are smart!
21. I hear a ticking sound, but my car didn't come with the chrono option. Should I be concerned?
22. I drive my car to get gas, but then it won't restart. It takes 4-5 times, what gives?
23. It smokes really bad, especially going up hills or sharp turns at full throttle. Just normal with these German engines?
24. I'm a hairdresser, should I purchase a Boxster over a 911? That's what they tell me.
25. I'm in the market for a 996, because of my budget. What should I look for for or avoid?
26. Anyone run a Carfax for me?
27. I'm considering a car located on the isle of Guacamoto, anyone available to fly out for a Rennfax?
28. My 996 only has 20K miles with a build date of 3/98, you think Porsche will give a goodwill warranty?
29. How do I tell if my IMS has been swapped out?
30. What oil is the best?
Cute list, and entertaining, but back to reality...
Open up the 996 forum, what do you see,,, the top of the page in 'stickey threads by admin,
shows what more than an acceptable amount of 996 are all about.
These are questions/answers the majority of new comers are looking to see...
Top of the page in sticky threads,,,
THEY unfortunately mostly ALL DEAL WITH CATASTROPHIC ENGINE FAILURES
It would be an interesting RL poll on quantifyiing if someone had engine failure, what caused it and if it happened on the street or track.
Not aware of any catastrophic failures on the track caused by bore scoring. Track guys usually change their oil very frequently. It usually has to do with AOS/hydrolock, oil starvation/pressure and cooling.
Street failures are commonly slow death by bore scoring and an old water pump with a broken blade that gets lodged causing cylinder/head cracking.
All are pretty easily mitigated if one is inclined to do it. Those that aren't interested in mitigating the risks or unfortunately purchased a car that wasn't properly mitigated may inherit issues that none of us want.
Same can be said for every Honda, Chevy, Audi engine as well. Issues may be different but outcome ends up being the same. Some fail catastrophically, some fail slowly, but those that do survive will eventually need a rebuild or a swap.
I think one issue that just creates circles is the reliability question..
Is the original 996 a reliable engine , it wasn't when they built it, it was kinda fragile for silly reasons...
I believe my rebuilt engine is far far far more reliable than it was in its original state, I don't expect many of the old problems to re-occur (I'm 60 I figure on driving it till I retire then selling as fixed income + Porsche maintenance... Not a thing) .
Bore scoring - check now has nickies (And a better tune!)
IMSB - Check now has LN solution
Head cracking or seat drop - check Hoffman rebuilt them with the fixes.
AOS - Check have UAOS now an dknow how to check it occasionally.
RMS - well thats a 60K service item at least.. (Crossing fingers)
General - I am on a service schedule (self inflicted ) of very regular oil changes and using a good oil (There are several )
Fuel - I run a can of injection cleaner 1 time between oil changes. (I use seafoam or Techron)
Mine is a daily driver, I dont expect some of the idle car issues that crop up.)
Yeah but you still have 250hp, are up 80lbs and are probably $20k in the hole. If you blow up the K series you can buy a stock low mile jdm import motor for $900 pull the head and send block to get a fully forged bottom end with machine work for $2,300.
the blue car is a street car. I picked up a low mile rainforest green 996 for ultra cheap and that�s getting a fia style cage like I did on my silver car. And of course the Honda motor. That will be the track car.
@BaysideFab
That $14K all in you mentioned . Is that labor included ? As in "turn key"..
In other words,can I just write a check for $14K and send my roller to someone and receive a daily driver street car back like yours?
Nice! It will be interesting to see if any issues to be had on track with the normal challenges.. Oil pressure (transverse engine) and cooling with boost,etc... Looking forward to seeing those updates
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/490x498/bd9e815e_9843_486c_b7d5_f5a0d443364d_ffbdf3624ba0d94e2ae0e6918b7bed1ae48e9729.gif
Thanks for clarifying, just trying to do the math..
So a roller plus a check for about $27k would get someone a car like your blue car..
OR if someone blows their engine they can stroke a check for about $27K and have something like your blue car..
Just looking at the big picture, your parts seem to be a small part of the total.....But your parts are well built and reasonably priced, and I wish you all the luck in the world ....
Ok so keep it on the level... I admire your build,, I thought a lot about doing something similar, but this is actually a car I bought for my wife to drive and share with me. We were after a specific experience.. We owned a 1969 911 When we got married 37 years ago.. That little 2 liter would stroll along back highways like nothing else.. Had no trouble getting north of 130 and not many cars back then could do that.. I miss a lot about that era of a car..
The 996.2 3.6 makes a documented 310 to 325 stock, It does 170MPH or better off the showroom floor and every one of them did it before shipping or it went back to the remediation line.
I've had plenty of other cars walk away.. heck you cant beat HP and I am not a friend of street racing.. But they don't drive like my car.. I wanted a Porsche, not a kit car.
If the car was specifically a track toy for me, I would have gone another route.. I'll be driving this car for about 6 years then it will get sold off.. (Retirement... )
I've cared for Honda race cars at the track, fun cars.. But I learned enough to know I don't want a K motor with a turbo for a road trip car.. (Fun weekend car at the local track.. )
Good luck with kitting this up I think you'll have some demand. Especially if you can piggy back the stock ecu on there to run the gauges!
Sorry for going off topic here, but pdxmotorhead, don't sell yourself short on enjoying your retirement. You car sounds like it is solid and dependable. Unless something catastrophic happens, your operating cost is no different than whatever car you'd replace it with. Not to mention, you only live once. Our cars add enjoyment to, and enrich, our lifes. It's better to burn out than just fade away.
OK, off my soapbox.
