26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSuspension updgrade options
Leading reported evidence
Replace (likely original) shocks and springs
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
After replacing the control arms, I'll be thinking about replacing the (likely original) shocks and springs.
Leading evidence: 'Replace (likely original) shocks and springs' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace (likely original) shocks and springs' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
After replacing the control arms, I'll be thinking about replacing the (likely original) shocks and springs.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not sure i can wait to see if they run the sale again..
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I do actually have "real world experience" with Swift having run their springs on two coilover setups on a 240Z that I've had since I was 16.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I do track my car several times a year so appreciated the adjustability of the V3s as well as setting ride height myself.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As to Swift's respect in the suspension industry, it probably says something that Ohlins uses "their" springs on their Road & Track setup, but when you drop another $2K to move up to their Track setup, you get Swift Springs.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm thinking of refreshing my suspension this spring. After replacing the control arms, I'll be thinking about replacing the (likely original) shocks and springs.
If I'm going to spend the money, I want to upgrade what I have to get some better handling and lower the stance a bit. This is a road car, so I want to keep the best ride quality I can, and I don't need to worry about maximizing performance on the track. I also want to keep the expense reasonable. I've been looking at options and it seems like this are the popular mods:
Springs and dampers
H&R or Eibach sport springs paired with Bilstein B8 or Koni shocks and struts. ~$1,300
Coilovers
* Feal 441 ~$1,300
* H&R Street Performance ~$1,800
* KW V1 ~$2,300
* Bilstein PSS10 ~$2,800
* Ohlins Road and Track ~$2,800
Factory sport suspension
ROW m030 suspension ~$3,600 (includes sway bars)
What's the best value here - the springs and dampers or Feal 441s? Am I missing anything I should be considering? There are other coilovers available but they aren't brands I'm familiar with.
Im buying ohlin r&t kit in the next 2 weeks. It seems to be the proven goto for hdpe days and street driving. Its a little pricey and i have been waiting on a coupon code but nothing has poped up since black fri. Looks like their last 10% off sale was end of march 2020. Not sure i can wait to see if they run the sale again..
Ohlins gets universally great reviews and would be a no brainer except for the price. That�s probably 10% of the value of the car. Also at twice the price, are they twice as good as Feal?
I don�t see myself swapping the suspension out just to sell the car.
Does anyone have any experience with this Flatout coilovers? I�ve seen them mentioned on other RL forums but not here.
https://flatoutsuspension.net/collections/sr
I put the H&R Street coilover on my 40 jahre in the fall and I like it. It's definitely geared towards street driving and I don't find it harsh at all. The downsides are that you need to keep it essentially at the top of it's adjustment range (any lower and the spring rate isn't enough to prevent the car from bottoming out over rolling bumps), and I feel the rear drop link mount design could be better.
I have H&R coilovers on my 993 as well and have had issues with the rear drop links loosening.
I don't have any experience with the other kits mentioned, so can't provide any comparative comments. But I am happy with the H&Rs.
I had B8/H&R and ultimately swapped them out for KW V3s. I do track my car several times a year so appreciated the adjustability of the V3s as well as setting ride height myself. I felt the B8s were too soft for track but held up well on the street for daily driving.
Out of your list I would probably consider Bilsteins or Ohlins. I haven't experienced budget coilovers on my 996, but I have on other vehicles in the past and there is a noticeable gap.
Thanks theprf for that tip, I was going to start a new thread about this because of the risk of this recall, to make sure as many folks are aware as possible, because even though the struts were registered to me, the recall was sent by Ohlins to my installer and he fortunately notified me. But it sounds like I may be one of the last to know after reading the 996tt forum on this.
Any opinions on Eibach 1 inch lower springs with standard Bilstein B4 dampers (or OEM dampers) for street only or once in blue moon track driving? Has anybody tried this setup?
OP - Let me help you make up your mind if you haven't already. Just listed my NIB Feal 441+ in the Marketplace for $1150 (plus shipping).
The 441+ gets you an upgrade to Swift Springs and these are sprung at 400/600 pounds which is pretty close to the standard 996 GT3 spring rates and a good compromise for street/twisties while still being well-mannered for a track day outing.
If you're not familiar with Swift Springs scan the web or check them out
https://www.swiftsprings.com/advantage/
. If you do choose Feal's take advantage of the opportunity to upgrade to them, you'll find they are worth the extra over no-name springs due to their proprietary raw material and QC.
^^^
Nice pitch... Why are you selling them NIB? You clearly have no real world experience with these right - i.e. you never installed them? Who said anything about "no-name" springs? I read through the thread and I saw, Bilstein, H&R, Eibach, Ohlins, KW, among others - of these, I'd say Feal is the least known of the bunch - personally I've got nothing against Feal (I have no experience with them as I haven't installed them on my car either), but I find your pitch "entertaining" to say the least - you should have left it at "Just listed my NIB Feal 441+ in the Marketplace for $1150 (plus shipping)." and left the editorializing for the marketplace...
Feal is owned, ran and managed very closely by Odi Bakchis - Odi is a successful pro driter and from what I have seen has put a lot into making Feal outshine most competitors at the price point. The fact that each set is assembled by his folks would give me some peace of mind, also knowing that the support staff for things like spring changes, revalves and repairs likely smoke any of the other brands you would look at in that price range.
You Tube
@dporto - Happy to entertain! I did feel my comments were equally "hey look here's a good deal for something you're obviously considering buying" as they were "if you're considering Feal....get the Swift Spring upgrade it's worth it".
Honestly editorializing is a pretty big part of why I'm a paying RL member...to learn from others here and share what I've learned with the community. I do actually have "real world experience" with Swift having run their springs on two coilover setups on a 240Z that I've had since I was 16. The "no-name" spring reference was with respect to Feal's standard 441 springs. Since most of these are entry level setups you're getting the coilover manufacturer's spring also (or one they OEM from someone). With the 441+ upgrade you get Swift springs (as well as some other features below not in the rest of the OP's list). As to Swift's respect in the suspension industry, it probably says something that Ohlins uses "their" springs on their Road & Track setup, but when you drop another $2K to move up to their Track setup, you get Swift Springs. I don't see Moton / MCS / JRZ / Penske putting H&R, KW, Bilstein or Ohlins springs on their coilovers; I do see Eibach, Swift and Hyperco on those setups.
Feal 441+ ($1600 MSRP) - Linear F&R Springs / single adjustable (upgradable to double or triple adjustable as well as remote canisters) / Swift Springs / Top Hats Included
* H&R Street Performance ($2250 MSRP) - Progressive F&R Springs / non-adjustable / Re-Use Your OEM Top Hats or Replace
* KW V1 ($2300 MSRP) - Progressive F & Linear R Springs / non-adjustable / Re-Use Your OEM Top Hats or Replace
* Bilstein PSS10 ($3000 MSRP) Linear F&R Springs w/ Tenders / single adjustable / Re-Use Your OEM Top Hats or Replace
* Ohlins Road and Track ($2,800 MSRP) Linear F&R Springs / single adjustable / Re-Use Your OEM Top Hats or Replace
* Ohlins Track ($4,600 MSRP) Linear F&R Springs w/ Tenders / single adjustable / Swift springs
/ Top Hats Included
My point is that Feal is building their suspensions on a model more like Ohlins Track / KW Clubsport or Moton / JRZ / MCS than on a more entry-level performance model like most of the OP's initially referenced setups. Am I saying Feal is at the level of higher-end Ohlins / Moton / JRZ, etc...probably not. But, they are offering some similar features and build-to-suit at an affordable price. Yes...I'm a fan of what they're doing.
Why did I not install them and am now selling them NIB? Well, I decided on going with a more track oriented setup and just got the JRZ's I ordered before the Holidays.
Now we could talk oil...if you'd like
Ohlins has an awesome setup, really the best quality you can get, however the standard spring rates are very firm. I ended up changing out mine with some Swift springs. I just need the weather to warm up from the current -15 to get out and see home much of a difference they make
That is correct, it did not look like that, there was another older thread where the guy ended up chopping a coil of the front to balance for his eibachs. I didn�t want to bother with it and switched to H&R. I can dig up the pics if you want to pm me.
I'm pretty sure that Eibach springs for 996 are designed for coupe and
NOT
cab. This is because the weights are too different and the kit is the same part number for both. (My assumption is that Eibach designed the springs with coupes in mind but it is theoretically possible to be the opposite, but improbable)
If we take the 996.1 coupe (lightest carrera 2) and the 996.2 cabriolet (heaviest carrera 2);
https://www.ultimatespecs.com/car-specs/Porsche/M574/911-Coupe-(996-series)
The Porsche 911 Coupe (996.1 series)
Carrera 2
weighs 1320 Kg /
2910 lbs.
https://www.ultimatespecs.com/car-sp...et-(996-series
)
The Porsche 911 Cabriolet (996.2 series)
Carrera 2
weighs 1425 Kg /
3142 lbs.
That's a
232
lb
difference but the two online retailers I looked at are listing the same EIbach spring part numbers for both cars! This has got to be wrong and bad for consumers. I believe the springs should not be sold as cabriolet parts especially considering H&R have different part numbers for coupe and cabriolet.
Maybe the Porsche Club of America should step in and raise this matter with Eibach?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.