14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAsking price vs. selling price
Leading reported evidence
Clean ppi
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For what it's worth, I got an '02 C4S with 46M miles, heavily optioned (incl nav/PCM, wood, advanced technic, sunroof, supple leather, etc.) + PSS9, GT3 links and sway bars, short shifter, etc., + clean PPI for $32.5M a couple of months ago (asking price was $37M).
Leading evidence: 'Clean ppi' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean ppi' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Clean ppi
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For what it's worth, I got an '02 C4S with 46M miles, heavily optioned (incl nav/PCM, wood, advanced technic, sunroof, supple leather, etc.) + PSS9, GT3 links and sway bars, short shifter, etc., + clean PPI for $32.5M a couple of months ago (asking price was $37M).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Peroidiocally I go on auto trader just to compare similar cars to mine (2003
C4S coupe, 23,000 Mi, 6, speed well optioned) And see what people are asking. Most are
asking
(key word) in the $45-50K range. The cheapest was an 02 w/ 60K on the clock for 29K and the most expensive was an 05 20K for $60,000.
If people are getting ANYWHERE NEAR THIS the market dosn't seem too bad. I read storys all the time on here where it seems people are saying they cant sell their low mileage 04's for much over 25K
It seems if anyone puts up a "what is my car worth" post everyone low ***** it. Sometimes I think we are devalueing (is that a word?) our own cars.
Just musing....
I agree that forums in general often push car prices down. At least within the forum. It's b/c people decide what they want to pay, and therefore when people ask what something is worth, that's the number they get. I have found location across the country effects price a LOT ($5k+ swings). I do hate to tell you, I don't see an 03 c4s getting near $50k, but I'm not positive. I know that 04 c4s cabs can be had bw $40-45k. I think also most asking prices are higher than they get and expect to get. The car I'm finalizing now I pushed down over 15% from asking price and it was already priced reasonably.
For what it's worth, I got an '02 C4S with 46M miles, heavily optioned (incl nav/PCM, wood, advanced technic, sunroof, supple leather, etc.) + PSS9, GT3 links and sway bars, short shifter, etc., + clean PPI for $32.5M a couple of months ago (asking price was $37M).
I bid $32M, which was what I thought would be a safe price even 2 - 3 months later in this market, and settled at $32.5M. [for you non-financial types, M is thousands and MM is millions (same as Roman numerals)!]
See "Price help on 2002 C4S Coupe" on this board or search my user name for pix and more details if interested.
+1
Last year I probably paid about $1,500-2K over a similar car without a CPO. You should've seen the crazy spreadsheet I had comparing cars and all their specifics - what do you expect from a math teacher!
Haha that's the exact approach I took when buying a bike last summer. I had all kinds of pricing info and mapped each one I was interested in against it. Helped me get a great deal.
It's not an issue of clarity. In Roman numerals, MM = 1000 + 1000 = 2000, not 1000 * 1000. That's why XX = 20, for example. M with a line over it is 1 million in Roman numerals.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
