18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDiligence on an ?03 Coupe
Leading reported evidence
Replace i think the dealer telling you
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I think the dealer telling you that the IMSB was replaced just because there's a tranny repair in its history is a flat out lie.
Leading evidence: 'Replace i think the dealer telling you' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check leakdown and bore scope camera' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I don't think Porsche dealers replaced IMSBs back in 2007.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Plan on lots of things that will need to be replaced, unless the maintenance is documented
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Based on overall condition, I had them do Tier 2 check: Leakdown and bore scope camera.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
No a seal is not an IMSB replacement, check on LN website for VIN to see if the IMSB (LN brand) has been replaced and registered.
Repair might be one of a precious few dealer visits
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you can find the dealer that serviced the car you'll have the best luck there...although it sounds like the RMS repair might be one of a precious few dealer visits.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Although I will most certainly have a PPI performed if I opt to move forward, I would love some help interpreting the Carfax statement that in 2007 at 15k miles, �the transmission was removed and reinstalled and the front crankshaft oil seal replaced.� This work was done at a Porsche dealer.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello Good People � I looked at a 996 manual coupe today (sans aero kit...boo!). It�s very clean inside and out. 35k miles but there are a few yellow flags: At a used car dealership; no known info on the 3 previous owners; only records are from Carfax; and at $34k the asking price is at the high end of the range. Although I will most certainly have a PPI performed if I opt to move forward, I would love some help interpreting the Carfax statement that in 2007 at 15k miles, �the transmission was removed and reinstalled and the front crankshaft oil seal replaced.� This work was done at a Porsche dealer. Is this an IMS fix? If so, given that it was done 13 years and 20k miles ago, should I be worried that it needs to be done again? Not surprisingly, the used-car dealer is claiming that all of this makes the IMS concern a non-issue but I always have a healthy amount of skepticism when conversing w/ a dealer. Am I seeing ghosts? Note, if I provide a Porsche dealer with the VIN, will they give me more detailed info w/o divulging any owner�s personal data? Kindly let me know. Thanks in advance!
No a seal is not an IMSB replacement, check on LN website for VIN to see if the IMSB (LN brand) has been replaced and registered.
13 years @ 20k miles
Plan on lots of things that will need to be replaced, unless the maintenance is documented
I would budget $4k-$5k the first year of ownership, unless you can wrench it yourself, this is realty of buying a garage queen
By all means do a PPI.
BTW, '03 Aero
Sounds like an RMS (Rear Main Seal) replacement by someone confused by the difference between back and front. I'd argue that this is useless information given the delta between when that repair was done and now.
I'd be super wary of this car. Plan on doing something about the IMSB in the immediate future (by a trusted shop, not as a condition of sale by this dealer) and a very thorough PPI. Unless this car presents 100%, I'd consider walking away now.
Results in getting dealer records tend to be mixed. If you can find the dealer that serviced the car you'll have the best luck there...although it sounds like the RMS repair might be one of a precious few dealer visits.
Sorry if this response comes off negative, but to me those yellow flags are red.
Thanks for the responses thus far. Please keep them coming. I truly appreciate the unvarnished truth. A bit sobering but want to be armed with as much info as possible so that I can become an educated buyer...whether on this car or another 996. Will see what other facts I can unearth on this car to be the basis for next steps, if any.
It's a really high asking price without any data to show the state of the engine, maintenance wise or current inspection wise. You cannot assume a low mileage engine is in good health. There are examples on both sides where there are zero issues going forward and engines fail in 100's of miles of purchase. Lower mileage cars tend to have more issues from sitting around. The problem is how to tell the difference right now. Oil analysis and bore inspections are the way to go, but this is tricky to get done as well as the sump needs to be removed and a scope goes poking around up in the engine. Since the price of the car is so high, maybe they'd be willing to do these things to support the sale. Cars with bad engines sell as 'rollers' for $5K-$10K because a dud engine is $20K-$30K to have repaired or replaced. These are amazing cars. Everyone on the boards seems to be addicted to them. Hopefully you'll be one of them. Move forward carefully.
2003 Couple is the best year of 996 lol. That is what I have.
My car was purchased from a Porsche dealer in late 2018, biggest in Canada. 45000 miles. I have records for the first 10000 miles and last 20000 miles. What sold me on the car was the Porsche battery showing it was dealer maintained.
I still had the car ppi'ed. Not at the selling dealer. 2 tiered approach to PPI. Tier 1: Basic checks. Brakes, Tires, Paint etc. Based on overall condition, I had them do Tier 2 check: Leakdown and bore scope camera. PPI found leaky RMS. Estimate of fix: $1400. Dealer discounted car by that amount. Car was bought, before taxes for $32K, Canadian. ~$25K US. Cars, even after exchange tend to be higher in Canada. Car was premium priced due to being at Porsche dealer and a Canadian car (Speedo in Kph).
I think your car is priced high.
Also, I had the solution, AOS, Clutch, Flywheel, Water pump done within 2 weeks of purchase.
Good luck with your search. You've just received about as much advice as you need...Car is grossly over priced. The IMSB should be addressed ASAP. Who knows how long oil sat in that engine before the dealership got it (did they change the oil yet?) a used oil analysis would be a good idea. AOS and Water pump and maybe the coolant tank would also be must do (ASAP) parts to replace and all fluids replaced.
Is this a base Carrera or C4S? If it's a base Carrera, then $34,000 is too high unless it has some really rare options.
That's very wise. Just make sure the PPI includes a borescope evaluation of the cylinders primarily bank2.
Do you have the actual invoice from the dealership? When removing the transmission it usually involves a new clutch kit, flywheel, and RMS, not front crankshaft seal.
Removing the transmission doesn't automatically they're going to carry out an IMS replacement, but it wouldn't hurt to see the actual invoice. Even still, 2007 is 13 years ago as you note and even if the IMS was replaced, it will be time to replace it again. Remember, not just miles, but also time in service.
Don't believe anything a used car salesman is trying to push in this case.
If you find the exact dealer that did the service, they might provide some information, but since it's been so long, I wouldn't bet on it.
I agree that this car is overpriced. Even if it were in mint condition, had all service records back to 2003 and proof the IMSB had been replaced it would still be a bit overpriced.
I think the dealer telling you that the IMSB was replaced just because there's a tranny repair in its history is a flat out lie. I don't think Porsche dealers replaced IMSBs back in 2007. If it went out, they just replaced the engine (someone correct me if I'm wrong here).
Buying these cars primarily for low mileage is a huge mistake.
In 2007 the IMS Retrofit was a black art. It took till 2011 or so for dealers to start doing the work using the components, and procedures/ tools that I developed.
In 2007 every dealer that someone talked to would tell them that it was impossible to remove the IMS bearing from the engine.
I lived through all those stories, and vividly remember it
Wow, I�ve been a member of this forum for all of 5 minutes and it�s paying huge dividends! Thank you very much. Though this exact car may not be in my future, a 996 will be for sure. I think I will hold off to get one with a better history and an aero kit. My hope is that my new found knowledge will be put to good use. As my late mother used to say, �don�t settle; wait for what you really want.� Patience was never my strong suit but I will heed my mother�s advise...this time!
I think I may have checked out this car today if it's located at a dealer in Lowell, MA. I'm in the hunt for a 996 as well. Of the four I've checked out recently, this was the cleanest. I got the same answer on the service records ("it's on the Carfax). Apparently it was serviced at Herb Chambers, so they will probably know more about the vehicle. Overall it was very clean interior and exterior. Tires had a 2017 build date and suspension looked clean with no torn/trashed bump stops that I've seen on some. That being said, yes, the price is on the high side, especially considering this is a pretty low option car. They may be paying too much attention to bringatrailer auctions and it's listed on CarGurus as a 4S, which may be influencing their pricing (even though it's not a 4S). I'm sure this one will go north of 30k, but not $35k. If this was a 4S, it would be a different story.
Yup, this is the one. Bought from Herb Chambers but serviced at a Porsche dealership in PA. To close the loop, I called the dealer in PA to see what I could uncover. Haven�t heard back. Won�t change my decision to pass given the spotty history and high asking price.
Unless things have drastically changed in the last 6 months, this 996 is way overpriced.
Might be a great deal if it passes a ppi and they drop the price 10K.
It's funny 'cause I also went to see a 996 today and had a very bad feeling about pretty much everything. In these cases, I simply walk away. Among the things I didn't like was the lack of all books and records. To me, it's not normal on a Porsche 911.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.