fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Basic track alignment specs needed

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHBasic track alignment specs needed

Reported or suspected cause

best you can hope

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

Camber on the fron of -1 degree is probably the best you can hope for with standard parts, but -1.5 degrees would be better.

Original post Read captured discussion
Basic track alignment specs needed
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'best you can hope' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'best you can hope' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

best you can hope

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

Camber on the fron of -1 degree is probably the best you can hope for with standard parts, but -1.5 degrees would be better.

Original post Read captured discussion
Basic track alignment specs needed
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

I was running this also with my stock suspension and it worked well.

Original post Read captured discussion

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Ive got stock suspension and wheels and need to find the preferred alignment specs for a track day on Yoko Advan A052. Everything i have found via search is on some sort of aftermarket suspension. I realize I won�t be able to get much camber up front.

POST 2Original post

front max the camber to whatever you can get. zero toe or a hair of toe out. Will give you nice turn in but a bit of nervousness on highway rear...probably 1.8 to 2 degrees of camber, slight bit of toe in. As you get fast, your tire wear will not be good as you start to beat up the outside of the tire.

POST 3Original post

You didn't say what diameter tyres you're running, but assuming 18" then Quadcammer has it right. By slight toe in on the rear, we're talking less than 10 minutes total toe, 5' per side. On the front go for no more than 4 minutes total toe in. At that level the give in the bushes etc will leave you with zero toe at speed on the track. In practice, any less than 2 minutes toe per side is hard to measure (this is 1/30th of one degree). Camber on the fron of -1 degree is probably the best you can hope for with standard parts, but -1.5 degrees would be better. The main reason for needing negative camber on the rear is to tame the oversteer encountered under deceleration, and -2 degrees should be achievable. If you have adjustable dampers then be ready to harden the rear to dial out understeer at the track, though it's really rear toe in that has the biggest effect on this for a 996.

POST 4Original post

Quotes source post: 17498091

I was running this also with my stock suspension and it worked well. Even/good tire wear considering track and driving to/from track.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.