16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPorschepile or Porcupine ?
Leading reported evidence
Use by jealous non-p-car owners
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The other names are used by jealous non-P-car owners
Leading evidence: 'Use by jealous non-p-car owners' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use by jealous non-p-car owners' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Never heard the term called porcupines used, except when making "the joke".
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Porschephile gets used a lot in print, but it's not usually used in conversation without someone sounding dorky.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T150451Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
When I had my Evolution, we were called Evolutionista's and the other camp as Subarista's. Ferrari afficionado's are called Ferraristi's and when I got my Ducati, I was known as a Ducatista. I've heard people calling Porsche lunatics as Porcupine and some are called Porschepile. So which is which? Porschepile sounds nice but somehow it sounds like a pedophile.
Well BMWs are reverse porcupines, and Porsche guys are Porschephiles. And if people get that confused with pedophile we could always start the
North American Man/Porsche Love Assocation
, or NAMPLA for short. That should clear up any questions about it.
They usually just call us awesome. Except women, they refer to us as handsome...
Haha, just messing...
I never really hear a certain name. Porsche guys usually just say "I'm a P-Car guy myself" & stuff like that. I never hear of Porscheistas, Porschers, Porschecupines, Porschephiles, Porschens... Just no. "P-car guy." That's it.
Porschephile gets used a lot in print, but it's not usually used in conversation without someone sounding dorky.
That said, Porschephiles are to Porsche what Ferrarista are to Ferraris. Never heard the term called porcupines used, except when making "the joke".
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif
https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/popcorn.gif
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
