9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHsqueak from antenna (?) in centre of dash
Leading reported evidence
Use head
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used my head on how it worked and solved it within the hour.
Outcome qualification: Negation, uncertainty or missing explicit repair resolution overrides the raw extraction signal.
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use head' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use head' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I was going to use just a drop of silicone caulking.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 1 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
There's a little thing that looks like an antenna at the centre of my dash where it meets the windshield. I'm getting a squeak from it. When I put a finger on it and put some pressure on it the squeak goes away. I don't think this squeak is the infamous windshield/dash squeak.
Has anyone else had this issue and found a fix for it?
Well....at least a fix better than driving around with one hand permanently on the squeaky part of the dash.
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/550x432/conspiracy_07626cb2d5786f08bf7802b049e6f67b13d14c7c.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/400x300/conspiracy2_f926170257270f00f13498669de995444ac6a17b.jpg
Good idea, I'll intend to hit it with some silicone spray and see if that fixes it. If the intent to do so doesn't fix it, then I'll actually spray silicone on it and see if that works.
Give it fair warning before you spray it. Tell it first what your intentions are. Then wait about half an hour and take it for another run. If the squeak is still there, spray the bejesus out of it. Then shout "I friggin told you so".
I was going to use just a drop of silicone caulking. Not sure about using spray.
And don't laugh, tin foil works. One day you'll see, and then you'll know!
Hey whatever floats the boat. I keep screaming how good WD40 is (but not in your case) and I get loads of stick from posters about it. I use my head first and a product secondly. We won't find out until we at least try things. For instance. Just this morning our Kuerig coffee machine went on the blink. We were considering buying the latest model as we have had this one for at least 5years. My wife was on Amazon selecting a newer model. I was using my head in the kitchen. No WD40 was used. I used my head on how it worked and solved it within the hour. Made two nice cups of coffee for me and my 'bread knife'. Cockney slang for wife). I am now her Knight in shining Armour. No sleeping on the couch for MEEEEE tonight.
its a cover for the gps antenna. it snaps in the dash and it has felt strip against the windshield. if you take it out maybe put more felt or rubber so it will press harder against the windshield, or just mash it so it clips in better. i wouldnt put any thing else on it
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
