33 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCalling all 928 and 996 HATERS, put away your beach cruisers...
Leading reported evidence
Use when a person has something more
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
used when a person has something more to say, or is about to add a remark unconnected to the current subject; by the way.
Calling all 928 and 996 HATERS, put away your beach cruisers...
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use when a person has something more' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use rennlistedtrtfytj' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Calling all 928 and 996 HATERS, put away your beach cruisers...
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
33 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T150451Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
BraH AH TyNkkk Da Oppppp izz conFUSED AN' HE ThiNKs If $omEonee talkk Badd AboUtt DA 996 Chu CaYn HIrEEE DIShERe GuaYY Fo' ProteCShun
Sent from my iPhone using Rennlistedtrtfytj
No intro needed... folks like Phil Raby and I go back a very long way in the Rennlist forums (more than 15 years here on Rennlist). I've been your
'fat and lazy'
"eidolon"
since about 2005 after this-
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-and-lazy.html
Oh BTW,,, don't make any presumptions of what I think about Phil... I love that guy and he sincerely has my respect.
So you came into the 996 forum to pimp an 11 year old thread about an article comparing the 928 to the 996 at the end of its run???
This must be what the 997 guys think when we invade their forum.
Oh well, I suppose it makes my recent sig addition timely
Perhaps you understand the video a bit better now after following the thread-
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-and-lazy.html
Or is it still a bit too cerebral for you?
LHM (Lawwwd Have Mercy)... I've been a 996 driver for over 12 years, that's long before your IMS drama began, and have been a lurking member here for longer than some of you have even been aware this list existed... just reading and occasionally chiming in on your posts. LOL
Yup, gnat... I can see you like the idea of repeatedly asking for that bike back, despite the potential consequences.
:giggle:
Perhaps, we should just drop it there, and just leave it at... I am back.
Nope... not looking for them, but I certainly will not tolerate them either. Incidentally, I dumped my 993C4 to get into a 996C4 and have not looked backed since.
in�ci�den�tal�ly
ˌinsəˈdent(ə)lē/
adverb
1.
used when a person has something more to say, or is about to add a remark unconnected to the current subject; by the way.
"incidentally, it was many months before the whole truth was discovered"
I suspect that's especially true for USMarines working on PhD's... LOL
Semper Fi, Brother
Saepius Exertus, Semper Fidelis, Frater Infinitas
The Marines - PBS Documentary (full length) - YouTube
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/659x604/image_a9e86e0b35c441cb0b1b174cfc7b64af8db41aaa.jpeg
Yea,,, I know what you mean. I once tried to be a rust picker, but they wouldn't let me join because my parents were married! Yeap... CG priorities are really different indeed.
السلام عليكم
