8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHA new 911T
Leading reported evidence
Replace with a button, a static exhaust, etc
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Manual seats, no sat nav, no sound deadening, no sun roof, no carbon brakes, suspension that can't be changed with a button, a static exhaust, etc.
Leading evidence: 'Replace with a button, a static exhaust, etc' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is '991 forum, of rumors about a new 911t' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace with a button, a static exhaust, etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause · Original poster
I read on another forum, probably the 991 forum, of rumors about a new 911T.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I read on another forum, probably the 991 forum, of rumors about a new 911T. Personally I think this is a brilliant idea! A little less horsepower than a base 911 maybe, but no options. Manual seats, no sat nav, no sound deadening, no sun roof, no carbon brakes, suspension that can't be changed with a button, a static exhaust, etc. Basically a less horsepower but less weight narrow body car that is "cheaper".
Other option, I was chatting about with my Cayman owning brother the other day, would be make a modern 912. Throw in the four banger from a base 718. Make it a light weight, low option car. I think that perhaps even with the less power the balance might be a little better as well. I think these would sell extremely well. People love the iconic 911 shape and heritage, but might not need a crap load of horsepower or electronic goodies and also don't want to spend a hundred grand. I suppose purists might scream bloody murder, as they do about all things new and different, but Porsche's main revenue, if I'm not mistaken, is already not from 911s but rather SUVs and those goofy four door things that have an *** only a mother could love (but the front looks pretty badass).
Any thoughts? Does anyone think they might do something along these lines? Maybe they can engineer a fatal flaw into them as well so in a few years prices will plummet and I can pick up a shinny new looking 911 with an engine made from blown glass and look cool!
Porsche sells every 911 it can build. Many of them it sells twice through CPO. They might sell 5% more 911s with a "stripper" model. (PSA - don't google "stripper model" at work).
But Porsche doesn't care.
It sells three Macans for every one 911.
You're right! But I think a lot of people would love a 911 that cost the same as a base cayman, even if it doesn't have the flat six sound. It being slightly more utilitarian with those "back seats". And while I love the Caymans, and will probably buy one at some point, I think the shape and allure of the 911 is just what people think of when they think "Porsche".
Noted. Stripper model googling saved for home internet private times...
