10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAny value in used dual mass flywheel, clutch and pressure plate?
Leading reported evidence
Replace got $300
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Got $300 for a clutch pack/dmf wi 30k when it was replaced with LWFW + clutch pack.
Any value in used dual mass flywheel, clutch and pressure plate?
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Replace got $300' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace got $300' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I replaced all three when I put in my IMS solution, but to be honest they were all in pretty good shape.
Any value in used dual mass flywheel, clutch and pressure plate?
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I replaced all three when I put in my IMS solution, but to be honest they were all in pretty good shape. I measured the clutch disc at about 8.4-8.5 mm thickness, which if I remember correctly was only .5mm less than the brand new one I put in. The DM flywheel rotates and springs back - I haven't measured it down to the millimeter but I believe its within spec and felt pretty similar to the brand new one.
Right now they're in my garage and taking up space that is interring with my attempt to build a golf simulator. So... they're either going out to the trash, or if they have any value I'll sell them.
Cheers
Charlie
Frankly, if I was that far in, I would replace everything brand new. However, some people have project cars and need to save a buck. Why not list the lot in the for sale forum, or post it up on EBay and see what happens? My choice would be to throw it all in the recycle bin and move on. Stuff has a way of accumulating......
Is it the overall thickness of the disc or the amount of material from the disc surface to the flange side of the rivet head? On my 996 Turbo a new disc measures 1.7mm and is considered worn out when this dimension gets to 0.3mm.
The value is in the DMF -potentially . If you do the correct measurement and it is well within spec., it could have value to a local buyer. Without the test it is .......
You Tube
How my DMF felt at 55k miles was the catalyst for me doing the IMS Solution and a bunch of other preventative maintenance, and I was impressed at how much better the car felt with a new clutch and DMF. You may be able to find someone to buy them around here and I suspect they would have more value that I'd expect, but to me the advertisement would read "Chewing gum, only chewed for a few minutes, plenty of flavor left"
