34 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPictures of Red or Green Porsches
Leading reported evidence
Use red cars
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use red cars' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use red cars' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
34 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T091943Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Since I need to know what BEAUTIES I will be passing on, if you have a red or green porsche please post a picture of it including the name of the color. I just love to drool over Porsches
Thanks for all your input.
No, I love the red but wanted to give this look a try. It looks super mean...nice and menacing when on track (where it lives).
Can't tell you how it's holding up since I only did it in Nov. and its been stored ever since. I'm hoping it wont get too torn up what with the rocks and rubber from the track. Time will tell!
Good luck on your search.
Oh and red is the fastest...after matte black that is.
[QUOTE=FLY996;8251421]
Thanks! I am partial too it and wasn't sure how lucky I was with it until I looked up the paint code. It was advertised as Guards Red...but it is not.
Is it me or does Guards Red look different in the flesh?
I know all these cars are really Guards, but it seems different to me up close, more red, less yellow.
Yeah, my camera doesn't do my red justice...like it is trying to compensate for proper red or something. Now that I have a real camera - I need to take more photo's. That is why I took a picture of my car with some real reds and guard red's at Petit Le Mans...really shows the different shades.
Looks different in person, that's why I added 2 pics (post #30), same car but the colors look very different. Lighting differences, especially direct sunlight, make a difference, along with my lousy camera skills...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
